This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Seoul article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days

This   level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Korea Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. East Asia ( defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles Cities: Core / National capitals This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles This article is on the project's core list. This article is supported by the project's national capital taskforce. Olympics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: Seoul: Memory, Reinvention, and the Korean Wave

March 25.1C new record on 22 March https://www.ogimet.com/cgi-bin/gsynres?ind=47108&decoded=yes&ndays=2&ano=2023&mes=03&day=22&hora=15

We need to thoroughly review the entire article. There are uncountable mistakes, regardless of whether it is a mistranslation, or a mistake they need fixed. The biggest issue is lack of conciseness, and readers are not here to read fluff. JamesJohnsonJo ( talk) 01:21, 21 May 2023 (UTC) reply

yup toobigtokale ( talk) 22:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Wikipedians, please stay away from flowery language and promotional tidbits. It almost reads as if the City of Seoul had its employees edit this page to include promotional information handed down. This page does not exist to convince readers of how great Seoul is. Jourdy345 ( talk) 11:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Another ask: I think the architecture section needs a significant rewrite. It mostly just names buildings, without much explanation of how the city designs/regulates the designs of buildings. Compare to London#Architecture. We can name drop a few of the most notable buildings, but only in appropriate context.

Anyone up for this? toobigtokale ( talk) 21:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Biggest issue is sources. Grammar and formatting is easy to fix. Please feel free to delete unsourced stuff if you can replace it with your own sourced writing.

Please don't add anymore unsourced writing; article has too much already toobigtokale ( talk) 22:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Please, these issues still need solving people :( toobigtokale ( talk) 14:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Still outstanding... Maybe in 6 months I can try to take this up, but fr it's depressing to be one of the only people tackling major issues on Korea-related articles. toobigtokale ( talk) 22:31, 4 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Same with Korean military articles. Still having problems with lack of sources. Cheer up Gasiseda ( talk) 20:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Everything about Korea on Wikipedia that isn't about war or pop culture is in a sorry state. These kinds of articles that appeal to general audiences need a lot of attention that they're not getting. toobigtokale ( talk) 08:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The article is thankfully slowly improving since my (toobigtokale) initial messages. It is still unsourced in some portions and missing a chunk of info, but hopeful that we'll get there. 104.232.119.107 ( talk) 16:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply