This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject United States History To-do: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs Other : Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess: {{ WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}} {{ WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

In the "Text" section of the document, I'm trying to insert a reference to the webpage http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c105:1:./temp/~c105zjXWvc::. Wikipedia's software is splitting the URL, cutting off the last two colons, such that one can't be hyperlinked to the proper page on Thomas.loc.gov. Any way to fix this? Thanks. 75.147.97.210 ( talk) 22:16, 8 December 2010 (UTC) reply

The articles lead seems take the proposed (and failed) amendment's text, twist it in the worst way and ramp it up to the nth degree to incite a negative reaction. Now I have my personal biases so I may be blinded to reality but I want to make sure whether it's just me or whether I'm right and it's portraying a negative POV towards the amendment. CRRays Head90 | ^{Get Some!} 13:17, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Over the two year period between June 1962 and May 1964, 111 different congressmen proposed 147 amendments that would make school prayer or mandated Bible reading legal. Why does this article make is sound like it was just one guy? Sorry if this is in the wrong place or formatted wrong, I don't have any experience editing wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:F470:22:13:4112:2311:6328:C7A1 ( talk) 14:41, 1 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on School Prayer Amendment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081129165838/http://www.au.org/site/News2?abbr=pr&page=NewsArticle&id=6009 to http://www.au.org/site/News2?abbr=pr&page=NewsArticle&id=6009
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081129154043/http://www.au.org/site/News2?abbr=pr&page=NewsArticle&id=5110 to http://www.au.org/site/News2?abbr=pr&page=NewsArticle&id=5110

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— ^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC) reply