Scallop was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 1, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This   level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Food and Drink task list: history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages. Fisheries and Fishing High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Bivalves Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bivalves, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bivalves on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BivalvesWikipedia:WikiProject BivalvesTemplate:WikiProject BivalvesBivalves articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale. Animal anatomy Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Animal anatomy, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to animal anatomy apart from human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject AnimalsAnimal anatomyWikipedia:WikiProject Animal anatomyTemplate:WikiProject Animal anatomyAnimal anatomy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Marine life High‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Marine life, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on marine life. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Marine life To do: history watch purge Have a look at the Marine life WikiProject and sign up. Here are some tasks you can do, as organized by The Marine life Wikiproject: Collaboration of the week: Marine life article assessment Other: See the projects page Images: Upload any non-copyrighted marine life images to Wikimedia Commons Featured Articles/ Good Articles: Other: Add {{Portal|Marine life}} to related articles

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Archives

1

... is like carrying coals to Newcastle. The author who wrote that "Medieval Christians making the pilgrimage to his shrine often wore a scallop shell symbol on their hat or clothes. The pilgrim also carried a scallop shell with him, and would present himself at churches, castles, abbeys etc.," is confusing medieval times with modern times.

The modern pilgrim-tourist-hiker buys a scallop shell and attaches it to his or her backpack from the start but in the middle ages "it became customary for those who returned from Compostela to carry back with them a Galician scallop shell as proof of their completion of the journey". Which makes sense, doesn't it? Maybe someone will care to correct this nonsense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.225.45.83 ( talk) 12:13, 17 May 2015 (UTC) reply

• Got a reference? Be WP:BOLD and make the change! Even an anonymous user can do this. Please feel free! KDS4444 ^Talk 14:28, 17 May 2015 (UTC) reply

 Done - Never mind, I did it myself. KDS4444 ( talk) 20:55, 8 January 2017 (UTC) reply

There might be some arguments in favor of putting the taxonomy first in the article, rather than the anatomy. We could also use a really good image of both valves of one shell laid out together. Invertzoo ( talk) 14:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC) reply

• Invertzoo: you would like a good image of both valves... on the inside? One inside out outside? Laid out how? What is it you think we should show in such an image? What aspects of the valves do you think would be helpful for us to display or point out? KDS4444 ( talk) 20:47, 8 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Also, while I agree that the taxonomy section is very important to defining the subject of the article, the current state of that section is highly technical (e.g., "The earliest and most comprehensive taxonomic treatments of this family were based on macroscopic morphological characters of the adult shells and represent broadly divergent classification schemes") and therefore likely to be more than a little offputing to readers that come here casually. Thoughts on that? KDS4444 ( talk) 01:06, 16 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Could you please reformat the two notes so that they work together. My bad. Sorry. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 17:55, 20 January 2017 (UTC) reply

There is still an issue. Don't need two different styles. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 13:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC) reply

I've tidied it up. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 14:19, 21 January 2017 (UTC) reply

 Done Thanks. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 14:35, 21 January 2017 (UTC) reply

We need to choose d/m/y or m/d/y and make it uniform. Is there a bot that does this? 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 13:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC) reply

 Done - I take it you are referring to the inconsistencies in the date formats of some of the references. As far as I know, it is up to editors to decide which style to use and then to make this consistent. I have now done this for this article. KDS4444 ( talk) 03:06, 23 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Copied reference from Pecten jacobeus to Scallop. See former article's history for exact credits. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 19:31, 21 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Having sections about scallops as a symbol and scallops as an animal together in one article seems inconsistent with what I have seen in the rest of Wikipedia. I would like to suggest that they be split up into separate articles with one just for the animal and one for the scallop symbol. 75.80.37.234 ( talk) 11:52, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Sandy reply

Actually it's entirely usual where an animal has cultural significance - see lion and wolf. At the moment the article is not so long it needs splitting. Johnbod ( talk) 14:10, 26 June 2019 (UTC) reply

The article says scallops have simple eyes. Technically I believe they are complex eyes. Cdellert ( talk) 02:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC) reply

See page 65 of /info/en/?search=An_Immense_World?wprov=sfti1

• 
  Scallop eye - immense world

The section Shell of Saint Augustine seems to be irrelevant to this article. It tells how Augustine saw a small boy transferring the ocean into a hole with a shell. But the story is not about the shell. The point of the story would be the same if the shell were a spoon, or if the boy were using his hands. And there is no hint that the shell, if it is that, has traditionally been a scallop shell, or that the story has anything at all to do with scallops.

What am I missing? Why is this here?

— Mark Dominus ( talk) 14:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC) reply

I have removed this section. — Mark Dominus ( talk) 19:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC) reply