This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: Los Angeles / Southern California Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Mountains Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

User2004, which redirects to Will Beback, added a list of named peaks in the Santa Monica Mountains. What is the source of this list? The reason I ask is that Mount Bell appears to be fictitious, and certainly is not in the USGS list of names in California. (Also, the claim that Mugu Peak is the westernmost is wrong. I can fix that, but it indicates unreliability of the entire list. But Mount Bell is "missing information" rather than "conflicting information".)-- Paleolith ( talk) 07:13, 3 January 2008 (UTC) reply

I don't recall the source. Mt. Bell is widely described on the Internet. [1] [2] [3]. What's the real westernmost named peak? ·:· Will Beback ·:· 22:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC) reply

OK, thanks. Apparently it is invariably referred to as Mt. Bell, and I was searching for "Mount Bell" as the article refers to it. However, the number of references found by Google is tiny -- on the same order as the number for Barney Knob, a summit near the intersection of Decker Road and Encinal Canyon Road known to the USGS but almost no one else, and not accessible to the public. Less than 1/10 as many references as for Mt. Lee. The Burbank topo quad shows the 1587' point with no name. It also shows a 1600+' point between there and Mt. Lee, also with no name. The USGS web site does not include it.

Well, there is no invariable about it, considering that "Mt." is merely an abbreviation for "Mount", and the decision as to which one to use is up to the writer. I have seen Mt. Wilson and Mount Wilson; Mt. Palomar and Mount Palomar; Mt. Whitney and Mount Whitney. This is also a failing with the Wikipedia, which should be programmed to recognize "Mt." and "Mount" interchangeably and everywhere. As it is, someone can search for a place (just to make one up) like Mt. Hamilton, but if the Wikipedia article is titled Mount Hamilton, then the search engine can return "no matches found". The computers should be programmed to recognize that Mt. = Mount; St. = Street; Ave. = Avenue; Hwy. = Highway, and so forth. For example, whether I see "Pacific Coast Highway" or "Pacific Coast Hwy.", my mind recognizes them as being the same without even applying any thought at all. It is just automatic. Likewise, Pt. Mugu and Point Mugu mean the same to me w/o bothering to think about it. Likewise, "Doctor Jeckyl and Mister Hyde" means the same as "Dr. Jeckyl and Mr. Hyde" w/o even applying one iota of thought to it. Why can't the computers be set up to do the same thing? And to do it nearly instantaneously? 74.163.36.44 ( talk) 05:23, 19 October 2008 (UTC) reply

The westernmost one is Laguna Peak. Pretty obvious to anyone who has stood on top of Mugu Peak. Laguna Peak has an antenna forest blocking the view of Oxnard. ;-)

This is all part of the question of what is a named feature, whose names, do we include informal names, etc. This is partly philosophical and partly practical. If we want a single citation, then I don't know where we can go other than the USGS. If we include other names, then we'll need to cite them all, and I imagine there are a LOT more names given informally (Eagle Rock for example). And what is the purpose of including the list? That might drive how it is derived and cited.

Here's the USGS list, east to west. What would you think about switching to this list, better formatted and with notes added of course, and perhaps sorted by height as is the current list. I do have qualms about a couple of the listings, especially Point Dume and Parker Mesa.

Feature_Name	Latitude	Longitude	El. m.	El. Ft.	Map_Name
Mount Hollywood	34.1280637	-118.3011874	492	1614	Burbank
Mount Lee	34.1347299	-118.3209103	521	1709	Burbank
Cahuenga Peak	34.1369520	-118.3259105	553	1814	Burbank
San Vicente Mountain	34.1286176	-118.5128608	598	1962	Canoga Park
Castellammare Mesa	34.0438975	-118.5595268	108	354	Topanga
Parker Mesa	34.0447306	-118.5734161	79	259	Topanga
Calabasas Peak	34.1122286	-118.6520307	644	2113	Malibu Beach
Saddle Peak	34.0758404	-118.6584189	851	2792	Malibu Beach
Laskey Mesa	34.1755606	-118.6811996	428	1404	Calabasas
Mesa Peak	34.0625069	-118.7189758	555	1821	Malibu Beach
Brents Mountain	34.0858398	-118.7225875	513	1683	Malibu Beach
Goat Buttes	34.0952841	-118.7389771	388	1273	Malibu Beach
Solstice Hill	34.0344516	-118.7498093	170	558	Malibu Beach
Ladyface	34.1350057	-118.7731458	619	2031	Thousand Oaks
Castro Peak	34.0858398	-118.7853675	855	2805	Point Dume
Point Dume	34.0016746	-118.8062001	56	184	Point Dume
Negrohead Mountain	34.1097284	-118.8098136	619	2031	Point Dume
Saddle Rock	34.0952843	-118.8298142	635	2083	Point Dume
Barney Knob	34.0775070	-118.8787049	527	1729	Triunfo Pass
Sandstone Peak	34.1202843	-118.9309301	899	2949	Triunfo Pass
Boney Mountain	34.1116734	-118.9592645	865	2838	Triunfo Pass
Clarks Peak	34.0833405	-118.9634310	600	1969	Triunfo Pass
Conejo Mountain	34.1883387	-118.9842666	548	1798	Newbury Park
La Jolla Peak	34.1152843	-119.0484349	466	1529	Point Mugu
Mugu Peak	34.0925068	-119.0548238	384	1260	Point Mugu
Laguna Peak	34.1086176	-119.0642687	433	1421	Point Mugu

-- Paleolith ( talk) 16:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC) reply

On further thought (previous entry was added last night but not signed until now), I'm thinking that the list should include all USGS summits but allow for others as well. At the moment I'm aware of four summits not on the USGS list, of which Mt. Bell is probably the least known. The others are Bee Rock, Glendale Peak, and Tri-Peaks. There are certainly more, as I haven't even really looked. Also, I would use the standard method for presenting coordinates. Unfortunately the ones which most need coordinates are the non-USGS ones, and finding a reference for those is harder. -- Paleolith ( talk) 16:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC) reply

I will have the list of flora (pretty much) complete in a couple more days. But I need photos that can go in Wikimedia Commons. Please help. Leave message on my talk page. EricDiesel ( talk) 23:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Post the list and I'm sure we can find or take photographs. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 05:56, 22 September 2008 (UTC) reply

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8526878.stm

---—  Gadget850 (Ed)  ^talk 21:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC) reply

An external link to hikespeak.com with information on 50+ hikes in the Santa Monica Mountains was removed from the Santa Monica Mountains Page for potential wikipedia guideline conflicts. A less topical list on outdoorla.org remains on the page. Is it appropriate for either or both links be included? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasquache74 ( talk • contribs) 09:28, 4 February 2012 (UTC) reply

User:Hike The Monicas added a photo with the caption "Heart Leaved Penstemon - Keckiella cordifolia - Wildflowers Santa Monica Mountains. Photographed in Malibu, California on the Backbone Trail". I copy-edited the photo caption to correct errors, but it was reverted. First, I changed the vernacular name of the plant to lower case, per WP:FLORA. Second, I italicized the genus and species, per grade 4 science class. Third, I moved the photo to the right, where it would be less disruptive to the section headings. Finally, I removed the location as being in Malibu, California. A glance at the the official map of Malibu, and the official Backbone Trail map, shows they don't seem to cross (but I may be wrong). Thank you for your input. Magnolia677 ( talk) 22:36, 27 August 2015 (UTC) reply

http://www.city-data.com/zipmaps/Malibu-California.html Hike The Monicas ( talk) 22:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC) reply

The Backbone Trail does not seem to enter the Malibu city boundary (in red) of the map you added. If it does, at what coordinate? This tool may help. Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 22:51, 27 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Except for the Eastern 2 miles near Will Rogers State Park, and the Western 3 miles near the Ventura County line, the remaining 62 miles of the trail lies within the Malibu, Ca zip code. | see Malibu Surfside News Quoting from the Malibu Surfside News: " Because the trail crosses all of the major canyon roads in Malibu" Hike The Monicas ( talk) 23:26, 27 August 2015 (UTC) reply

The city of Malibu did not incorporate all the areas traditionally considered in the community of Malibu long before a city existed. The Malibu zip code includes an even larger area that is conveniently delivered by letter carriers from the Malibu post office. It is a logical error to say the true statement "the trail crosses all the major Canyon roads in Malibu" therefore "the trail is in the city of Malibu" (not true). The roads all start at PCH in Malibu but the actual trail crossings are outside the city limits.

I understand your reasoning, but like a lot of things, Wikipedia doesn't allow original research. We have to rely on secondary sources. Nonetheless, it's just not that important to me. Oddly important to others, which makes Wikipedia a mostly non-collegial place. That has to change if Wikipedia is to continue. Hike The Monicas ( talk) 21:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC) reply

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Santa Monica Mountains/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 00:25, 8 December 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 05:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Laurel Canyon Blvd is listed with the roads that are further west than the Sepulveda Pass. Actually Laurel Canyon runs well to the east of the Sepulveda Pass, between Coldwater Canyon Blvd and the 101 Freeway. Blixton ( talk) 00:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Can you provide a citation for this? FreeKnowledgeCreator ( talk) 08:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Santa Monica Mountains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101025083457/http://www.lamountains.com/parks.asp?parkid=670 to http://www.lamountains.com/parks.asp?parkid=670

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC) reply

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2023 and 1 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): KatieChen88, Sturgafish ( article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by KatieChen88 ( talk) 18:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC) reply