This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please
join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
The map
When you click on it, it fails to mention (at least) California as forming part of the yellow-shaded Mexican area. Why?
Contradiction?
Intendente says that Santa Fe de Nuevo Mexico was instituted in 1834.--
Rockero 23:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Intendente now gives the dates 1595 to 1824 which matches the late 16th century to early 19th century that's given here so I'm going to remove the contradiction notice.
Kmusser 19:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Occurs to me that the confusion may be due to "Santa Fe de Nuevo Mexico" being the name of the both the New Spain province and the territory of independant Mexico.
Kmusser 19:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Why were my changes undone?
The New Mexico navbox belongs on this page, as it is included in that navbox and topic (literally Nuevo México). Another thing, is that Nuevo México was a Kingdom in New Spain, not a Province, that distinction is important in explaining the relative autonomy of the region. Another another thing, the vecino citizen-soldiers did become the New Mexico National Guard. The last thing to say, is that it was the citizen-soldiers that captured the Texan Expedition, not the Mexican military, since Governor of New Mexico was the one that captured the Texans outside of Santa Fe. All of these things are fairly common knowledge.
2601:8C2:8080:1BC0:6CB9:4CA4:4242:6A86 (
talk) 19:44, 20 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Hello! I did not revert your changes, but I'm guessing that the editor who reverted them did so because the edits were not sourced with references. See
WP:BRD - if you can find sources, (since your contributions are "fairly common knowledge") they should be out there, you might want to include these in the discussion.
Netherzone (
talk) 23:07, 20 May 2020 (UTC)reply
What happened to the Pueblo after the Pueblo Revolt?
There is very little information on this article about the fate of the Pueblo after the Pueblo Revolt. It's hard to believe that nothing happened from then to American incorporation. What was Mexican occupation like? American occupation?
Yourlocallordandsavior (
talk) 05:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Typo or not?
Is this a possible typo: The infobox states that the terittory of "Santa Fe de Nuevo México" was part of the "Territory of the
First Mexican Republic (1823-1848)".
But didn't the First Republic end in 1835. With the successive
Centralist Republic existing between 1835-1846? So shouldn't we add another line for "Centralist Republic"?
Danial Bass (
talk) 10:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)reply