This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Transport: Maritime Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Maritime task force (assessed as Low-importance). National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I think that the article name should be changed to San Francisco Ferry Building because I searched that and it came up blank. How do I change the article name? Also, I was doing a school project, and didn't find this page helpful. It needs more architectural/design information.

Istillcantlogin ( talk) 23:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:San Francisco Ferry Building (cropped).jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 27, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-06-27. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! —  Chris Woodrich ( talk) 01:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Picture of the day

The San Francisco Ferry Building is a terminal for ferries, incorporating a food hall and offices, located on The Embarcadero in San Francisco, California. Designed by architect A. Page Brown and completed in 1898, the building saw decreased use after bridges across the San Francisco Bay were built. It underwent a major restoration in 2002, which included the refurbishing of the Great Nave and the addition of a marketplace. The building is a designated San Francisco landmark and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.Photograph: JaGa

Archive – More featured pictures...

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on San Francisco Ferry Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120326123104/http://www.atlantamagazine.com/covereddish/diningnews/blogentry.aspx?BlogEntryID=10261127 to http://www.atlantamagazine.com/covereddish/diningnews/blogentry.aspx?BlogEntryID=10261127

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Currently, this building is in Category:Financial District, San Francisco. Should we also add Category:South of Market, San Francisco, since the building extends south of Market? --- Another Believer _{( Talk)} 20:07, 3 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Absolutely not. South of Market does not include everything south of Market Street, particularly near the Embarcadero where the South Beach and Rincon Hill are. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 20:42, 3 October 2018 (UTC) reply

The article currently states "While the demand for ferry transit has experienced increasing demand in recent years by cross-bay commuters, the ferry service will never again reach historic levels."

I don't see how this could possibly be stated as a fact. We can't predict the future, and no numbers are presented to make the case for this argument. MrEricSir ( talk) 06:40, 10 August 2019 (UTC) reply