This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Greater San Diego should not redirect here. There is such a thing as the Greater San Diego area that does not include Tijuana. Most San Diegans don't consider the Tijuana region to be part of the same metropolitan area as San Diego. - Branddobbe ( talk) 06:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Neither the United States or Mexico recognizes joint metro areas and the United Nations does not recognize urban areas crossing national boundaries in areas where travel is restricted in the way that it is at the U.S./Mexico border. chazman ( talk) 23:28, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
06:57, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
i looked at the satilite map and yes there is continus build up from Sandiego to Tiauna.i know of 4 other aglomerations that cross international borders theres Detroit , buffalo and Shenzen-hong kong in china. Shenzen is on a international border casue China reconizes Hong kongs soverenty as a colony and lets it be semi-Indipendent im not sure but i also think theres a other metro poiltan area that croses a border and thats El Paso,texas. just because the UN does not reconize international border cities does not mean they dont exist
Polaron, I'll just point out that since this article was well established it was inappropriate for you to rename it without discussion. Clearly you did this as part of the agenda related to El Paso-Juarez.
Nevertheless I'm not going to get involved in this article right now so the Californians can decide what they want to do.
-- Mcorazao ( talk) 03:07, 26 February 2010 (UTC)