This   level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Mid-importance). Geography Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Geography To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{ WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles. Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes Map : See Wikipedia requested maps Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places Stubs : See Geography stubs History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Economics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Sociology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

No, Cinagroni, the "Rust Belt" is not a well-established geographical region such as Appalachia or New England. The current lead sentence is about useless: The Rust Belt is a region of the United States that has been experiencing industrial decline starting around 1980 as it even fails to define the subject - which region, where? There are certainly many more regions experiencing industrial decline across the US, but they aren't part of the "Rust Belt". This article could as well be called Economic decline in the northeastern United States – it's mostly about deindustrialization and depopulation of that area, not about physical geography. The #Geography section sums it well: Since the term "Rust Belt" is used to refer to a set of economic and social conditions rather than to an overall geographical region of the United States, the Rust Belt has no precise boundaries. The extent to which a community may have been described as a "Rust Belt city" depends on how great a role industrial manufacturing played in its local economy.
I strongly feel that this article falls more under the WP:WORDISSUBJECT category than under the common format of geographic articles. No such user ( talk) 09:32, 4 November 2020 (UTC) reply

No, No such user, I did not say that the Rust Belt is a well-established geographical region. The current lead sentence is about useless: "informal term"? Formality has absolutely no relation to anything here. "the region"? Using the definite article presumes familiarity with the concept.

You want the first sentence to more precisely say where this region is? That is reasonable. So add it. For example: The Rust Belt is a region of the northeastern United States that has been experiencing industrial decline starting around 1980. But writing "X is a term for Y" is just poor. If X is a term for Y, then X is Y. The only reason to write "X is a term for Y" is if you are discussing the term itself, and not the concept Y. This might apply, for example, to the " Stroke Belt", which is a term you certainly wouldn't be able to use without clarifying that this is a term used in public health to refer to a southern region of the US. Rust Belt is widely used and widely understood, and the article is not about the term "Rust Belt" but the region known as the Rust Belt. Cinagroni ( talk) 08:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Cinagroni Fair enough, but I do not see a substantial difference between Rust Belt and Bible Belt (or Stroke Belt for that matter, or Tornado Alley, all of those using variations of WP:REFERS, rightly or wrongly). Yes, "Rust Belt" is somewhat more established and better-known term than those, but just how much is open to debate. Rust Belt is widely used and widely understood – in the US perhaps, but worldwide I'm not so sure. I'm currently browsing through British and Irish news sites, and the belt is frequently written about in the election context, and many of them do introduce the term in a single sentence (but continue to use it throughout) ( Independent); yet others use it from the outset assuming readers' familiarity (BBC). I'm willing to concede this one, I suppose. No such user ( talk) 14:08, 5 November 2020 (UTC) reply

From a British perspective I can tell you that the Rust Belt is a term that would be reasonably familiar here. As you rightly say, the BBC uses it without considering that it needs explaining. For comparison between those terms, ngrams are useful and show that Rust Belt and Bible Belt occur with similar frequency (though Bible Belt is the older term), Tornado Alley occurs about a quarter as often, and Stroke Alley a large factor less often. [1]

Meanwhile, I do not think Bible Belt or Tornado Alley should start the way they do either. I edited Tornado Alley. One suspects that a single editor might have been at work in several of these articles and this was their favoured formulation but I think that unless the article is about the words themselves, it's not correct to use the "is a term that refers to" type of formulation, and none of these articles are about the words themselves. Cinagroni ( talk) 19:20, 6 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Could anyone please replace the 2018 estimates with fresh 2020 census numbers? They often tend to be higher than estimates. Thanks in advance! Ain92 ( talk) 11:28, 24 August 2021 (UTC) reply

I would like to raise two issues about the map at the beginning of the article:

1) The source for the 1954 data is simply not specified
2) As this page makes clear, manufacturing decline went into a freefall in the 2000s, and the map stops at 2002

Could somebody please fix that? Esszet ( talk) 15:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC) reply

shouldn't new jersey be considered rust belt the article has trenton listed there and then there's newark and jersey city which were also major factory cities so I'm confused? 142.122.125.164 ( talk) 19:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC) reply