This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Catholicism Mid‑importance Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Francisco is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Catholicism task list: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : see Draft articles Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page) Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

While I agree that Archbishop Montgomery should be mentioned on this page, he was not an Auxiliary Bishop and thus should not be on that list (at least without clarification). He was actually the Coadjutor Archbishop. He never succeeded to become Archbishop because he died before Archbishop Riordan.-- Dcheney ( talk) 02:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC) reply

I have adjusted the section. Elizium23 ( talk) 02:54, 20 October 2014 (UTC) reply

In 2016, I anonymously noted that 2 bishops of this diocese had been coadjutors. THAT information was placed alongside the respective entries in the bishop-of-the-diocese list. The "coadjutor & auxiliaries" list has a note about that as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.102.56.186 ( talk) 20:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

It seems odd to have auxiliary and coadjutor bishops listed under a section titled Ordinaries, since by definition, auxiliary and coadjutor bishops are NOT ordinaries!-- Dcheney ( talk) 16:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC) reply

I am still doing anonymous editing, and changed this heading to "Bishops". Also, I have added other priests of this diocese who became bishops, in line with what the catholic-hierarchy site does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.102.56.186 ( talk) 20:16, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

I have put that section back in. I used the catholic-hierarchy site for this information. For each diocese, it lists affiliated bishops, and it includes some who were not bishop of the diocese OR coadjutor OR auxiliary; it includes a bishop who served any part of his priesthood in that diocese, even if it was not as a bishop. OK?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.102.56.186 ( talk) 20:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Francisco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{ dead link}} tag to http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1203179.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050320050109/http://www.sfarchdiocese.org/cathedral.html to http://www.sfarchdiocese.org/cathedral.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC) reply

At first glance, the use of the Profit/Loss indicators suggests things that just aren't true. In particular, the Loss marker before 24.5% strongly suggests that the Catholic population is down by 24.5% - which is not true - it is more like 6%.-- Dcheney ( talk) 01:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC) reply