This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Catholicism Mid‑importance Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Catholicism task list: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : see Draft articles Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page) Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles New York City Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New York (state): Hudson Valley Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley (assessed as Mid-importance).

See Talk:Roman Catholic Bishop of Quebec for nomenclature discussion. - Montréalais

EFGHIJ: these people are correctly termed "Cardinal Archbishops". "Archbishop X Cardinal Y" is wrong. An alternative would be "X Cardinal Y, Archbishop of New York". -- Someone else 23:33 20 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Is "Cardinal Archbishop X Y" acceptable? - Montréalais

I think it is, but agree with Vicki that "X Cardinal Y, Archbishop of New York" is the most common use that includes both the title and the office. (Though doing it that way, you lose the middle names). -- Someone else 00:19 21 Jul 2003 (UTC)

I've never seen "Cardinal Archbishop" used as a title; they're just called (for example) "Francis Cardinal Spellman" or "Cardinal Francis Spellman", depending on context.

The personal title of a cardinal is in the form "Francis Cardinal Spellman". The informal usage since Vatican II is "Cardinal Francis Spellman" (but that is not used in wiki for pratical reasons - 90% of cardinals predate Vatican II and were never known by the latter format and it would involve renaming over a thousand years of cardinals. '"See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles)) When an archbishop is made a cardinal, their office is referred to always as Cardinal Archbishop, eg, Cardinal Archbishop of Dublin, Cardinal Archbishop of New York. (Venice has a Cardinal Patriarch.) FearÉIREANN 01:20 21 Jul 2003 (UTC)

As a separate matter, if anyone knows exactly what the current boundaries of the archdiocese are, that information would be worth including--I know it's part of NYC and some of the suburbs, but not all of either. Vicki Rosenzweig 00:04 21 Jul 2003 (UTC)

The New York Archdiocese covers (in NYC) Manhattan, the Bronx, and Staten Island, but not Queens or Brooklyn (which are in the not-very-imaginatively named Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and Queens). It also takes in Dutchess, Orange, Putnam, Rockland, Sullivan, Ulster and Westchester Counties. (I'll put this in the article, which was named "List of....etc" before it got moved around, and probably best belongs there: the archdiocese or the bishopric of the same seems to be a different article). -- Someone else 00:19 21 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Article moved from "Archdiocese of New York" to "Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York" for (1) uniformity with other Roman Catholic diocesan article titles as per wiki standard and (2) clarity between denominational diocesan territories of similar names (i.e., Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of New York, Episcopal Diocese of New York, etc.). -- Gerald Farinas 22:44, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The article currently indicates that Archbishop Dolan is "Archbishop-coadjutor" which is not a term used in the Catholic Church. There is such a thing as a "Coadjutor Archbishop", but Archbishop Dolan is not one.-- Dcheney ( talk) 01:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC) reply

I removed the Unreferenced Section tag at the top of the History section. I recently added additional information to the section with numerous citations. I also went back and cited all of the information that was previously in the section but was without a citation. The History section now should be thoroughly cited and quite comprehensive. Ergo Sum ( talk) 20:19, 30 June 2015 (UTC) reply

@ Laurel Lodged: I think you are confusing MOS:SAINTS and MOS:BIO. The former applies to article names, however the latter applies for the names of clergy and saints in article text. Since MOS:HON is a subsection of MOS:BIO, therefore the advice of MOS:HON does apply in this instance. MOS:HON states that in general styles and honorifics related to royalty, clergy, and sainthood should not be included in the article text. Additionally, Wikipedia:WikiProject Saints/Style Guidelines has a section on article titles but is generally about article text and would also apply. Imo, this guidance is similar to the exclusion of other religious styles and honorifics, such as that in MOS:PBUH. FyzixFighter ( talk) 22:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC) reply

FyzixFighter I think that it's yourself that is misinterpreting the policies. If your interpretation was correct, then the phrase "St Thomas" could never appear in an article; it would have to apppear as "Thomas". That would leave a lot of people scratching their head. Laurel Lodged ( talk) 08:31, 11 August 2022 (UTC) reply