From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

Seems pretty obvious that Abanes wrote this page. There's no objectivity whatsoever in this article. The neutrality of this article should be questioned. Best-seller? Well-known? Please back up all claims with FACTS!!

I'm thinking the same thing. It's practically glowing. -- RThompson82 ( talk) 03:34, 5 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Cleanup

This page needs some formatting, and wikifying. The structure of the article needs work. There are probably some POV issues as well. -- Andrew c 01:41, 5 April 2006 (UTC) reply

There is no "probably" with the POV issues. If this wasn't written by Abanes himself, it was his PR guy. Definitely needs work -- I added more appropriate tags to describe the problems. Midnightcoffee 18:51, 26 December 2006 (UTC) reply
I agree it sounds an awful lot as if it was written by Abanes himself. I have had some personal go-arounds with him in email and this articles sounds like him. It needs more neutrality as well as more citation. FannyMay 02:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC) reply
I would certainly suggest that the wording be altered that references his "bestselling author" status, since as a non-US citizen I hadn't even heard of him before I started researching Mormonism to a deep degree. I feel it's quite "weasel-wordy" to say that he's an American author and then say separately that he's a "bestselling author" because the way that is done implies he's a bestselling international author, which clearly isn't the case judging by the fact that Amazon.com rank his book #25 out of 100 in the category "Mormonism: Controversial" and only in the late 617000's as an overall sales rank. Whisperwolf ( talk) 02:31, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply
I've done basic grammar/wiki/style clean-up, non-NPOV clean-up, and general de-weaselwording throughout the whole article...I also added a good number of wikis that should help supplement the sources and provide a tad bit more neutrality. It seems that it was a mash-up between Abanes PR copy (which I have seen elsewhere in basic bio write-ups) and upset Mormons who were unhappy with his books on the LDS church (along with the guys who believe Abanes plagiarized "approximately 90 words" in one of his books). I also moved some sections around to fit the general Wikipedia bio format. [If Abanes reads this... FYI: I shortened a number of lists to include the most notable of the bunch, as that is more encyclopedia-like and actually increases the sense of legitimacy.]
The biggest change I made was to the LDS section, in which there was previously 1) semi-non-NPOV Abanes descriptive copy, 2) very non-NPOV upset Mormon criticism of his books, and then Abanes rebuttal to the Wikipedia criticism, which included an expanded version of the partial quote #2 was denouncing. It looked like a sort of blog comments section complete with repeated quotes, so I tried to neutralize the tone and combine the two Abanes sections into a few statements, along with the Mormon criticism. However, the quote in question still looked weird because both contributors had stuck it in the middle of a sentence and used weird punctuation. Thus, if anyone has the book (I don't) and cares to look it up/fix it if necessary, good for you. Efrafra ( talk) 21:41, 13 May 2008 (UTC) reply

merge tag

I added a merge tag. It's a nice way of saying the page on One Nation Under Gods (a book) should be deleted due to notability concerns. - SESmith 22:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Deletion

Some idiot added "He's also a liar! Don't read his works." Save this for your blog! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.88.151 ( talk) 19:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Holy Nonattribution Batman

Could someone please add some sources for this article?? ClaudeReigns ( talk) 06:38, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Missing Important Information

No article about Mr. Abanes would be complete without mentioning his anti-Mormonism. While a neutral POV is certainly critical, the fact that this article makes no mention of some of his more controversial statements makes me question its value/credibility. 66.75.28.139 ( talk)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 02:36, 14 June 2013 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Richard Abanes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC) reply