This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Protected areas Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Hawaii This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I propose to merge USS Arizona Memorial into this page. This page was created as a stub article when the new memorial was enacted, yet much content describing not only the Arizona memorial but also the USS Missouri Memorial and other parts of the Pearl Harbor unit are discussed in some detail already at the source page. This page is the best title for such content and it should be merged here; USS Arizona Memorial will then redirect here. Mdewman6 ( talk) 07:22, 15 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Oppose For two reasons: first this article is a coherent whole, and seems sensible as its own article; second that I can see the proposed article becoming unwieldy and overlarge. I don’t think it would be long before the separate articles were recreated. Springnuts ( talk) 07:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC) reply

• Oppose per Springnuts. The two articles seem fine as well-written and detailed stand-alone and important-topic pages. Randy Kryn ( talk) 03:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC) reply