From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pato Branco

Pato Branco was removed from the list of cities, without comment. I don't know a thing about it, whether the place even exists, or what, but could someone explain the reason for the removal. -- Jmabel | Talk 05:14, May 7, 2005 (UTC)

We have an article, on it, which I assume is legitimate, so I am restoring. And please don't remove other people's comments from the talk page. -- Jmabel | Talk 09:09, 6 November 2005 (UTC) reply

Well, I live in Curitiba, the capital city of Parana. The city of Pato Branco ("White Duck") surely exists. I've never been there, but I have friens living there and the University in which I lecture has a campus in Pato Branco. Take a look at http://www.pb.cefetpr.br and also at http://www.patobranco.pr.gov.br/site.

Alvaug, 2/6/2005

Anon removal without comment

[1] removed "Nevertheless, the state has some critical social problems, mainly in the west and in the suburbs of the city of Curitiba and Foz do Iguaçu." - Jmabel | Talk 16:48, 24 March 2006 (UTC) reply

In fact that really happens. Foz had a really huge increasment of its population, and that has been causing some urban problems. But despite this, the west is the most developed region in Paraná. The city o Curitiba demand no comments. Lately has been a disaster the way the city has been growing. It doesn't seems anymore the city which one day was called "Model of development". Squibb 01:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Moved to here from the article...

The following text moved from the article to here as point of view and also for lack of citations of source material.


<blockquote=" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraná_(state)"> In October 2003 the communist government of Mr. Roberto Requião, the state governor, tried to impose to Paraná a ban in both the cultivation and transportation of genetically modified crops. This was stricter than the Brazilian standard, and eventually found unconstitutional and overruled by federal courts. The claim of Paranian farmers blocked such insane initiative and today at least 80 % of the soybeans produced on the state are OGM, and OGM corn is coming as well.

The official propaganda of Mr. Requião has tried to sell Paraná as Brazil's largest exporter of organically-grown crops.

Nevertheless, and apart of chemiophobia, the point is that agriculture in Paraná still keeping by itself his heritage of high technological grounds, being concerned today in saving precious resources, like fuel, water, land and fertilizers, as well in cleaning the atmosphere by the sequestration of carbon result of the largest no-tillage move in history. This demand well qualified and paid jobs, and the result has being an all around development of the countryside related to agriculture, with an impressive decline in poverty on the last decade.

Must be stated that this great social improvement, like all children in schools, improved healthcare, homing and standard of living of the people as all, elimination of hungry, shining cities, paved roads, all has being acquired none by gift of whatever government but by the Paranian way of doing: Working hard, being righteous, loving and protecting family and land and never expecting nothing from nowhere but his own work

Guess there is lots of work to be done until we have some neutral POV on these topics here. (Highlighted in bold: any phrase that is especially problematic with reference to point-of-view statements. Try to start with quotation of reliable sources. Remember that Wikipedia is meant to convey information based on facts only.

--guest ip 2008/Dec/14 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.28.225.125 ( talk) 00:22, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply

File:Londrinalago.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Londrinalago.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 13:36, 6 December 2011 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paraná (state). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at

{{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Paraná (state). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC) reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 22:38, 17 July 2019 (UTC) reply