This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S.
historic sites listed on the
National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles
Telfair Museums has officially changed the name to the Owens-Thomas House & Slave Quarters. It is no longer just the Owens-Thomas House. This can be confirmed by checking Telfair Museums' website at Telfair.org.
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
207.144.16.131 (
talk) 21:34, 6 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Reply 07-NOV-2018
Wrong template. Please utilize the {{
Requested move}} process
The name has already been changed in the article by the requesting IP editor.
Placing the edit request template after this change was made implies that further changes should be made, perhaps to the article's title. If this is the case, the request to change an article's title should be submitted using {{
requested move}} specifically as a controversial move request process requiring discussion amongst the wider community. More information can be found at
requested moves.
If this is not the case then the IP editor may disregard that suggestion and their request is closed. Regards, Spintendo 09:47, 7 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Requested move 30 September 2019
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Owens–Thomas House →
Owens–Thomas House & Slave Quarters – Reflect official name change as reflected in the text of the page, as noted in official web pages, as noted in radio coverage on NPR's 1A program, and in order to clarify more fully for visitors and interested parties what the museum is about.
★NealMcB★ (
talk) 17:01, 30 September 2019 (UTC) --Relisting.Steel1943 (
talk) 14:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose. The house is the main topic. The slave quarters are an annexe to it. This sounds a bit like a marketing request (see
WP:OFFICIAL). Keep the more concise title. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 12:24, 2 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Slightly oppose. I've known about the Owens-Thomas house since the mid 1960s, and been there, and it was always called "the Owens-Thomas house".
Bubba73You talkin' to me? 15:35, 2 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Support. If you haven't visited the site recently or seen recent coverage, I wonder if that would change your minds. I resent the suggestion that this is a marketing request. I have no association with the owners, and simply heard an extensive national talk-show interview and discussion about the site and the tour of it. That made it clear that there is a very large focus on the slave quarters.
WP:NAMECHANGES notes that after a change in name (which is the situation here, as of a year ago: 2018-11), there should be extra focus on such secondary sources, and "If the reliable sources written after the change is announced routinely use the new name, Wikipedia should follow suit and change relevant titles to match." Since I made this move request, I've found and updated the article with more information and citations from the last year which strengthen the case, I think.
★NealMcB★ (
talk) 15:40, 6 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Struck support. You obviously support, given you're the nominator! If it's not a marketing request then I apologise for the suggestion (although it certainly did look like one - this is commonly how such requests are phrased), but my opinion stands. The current name is the best name on an encyclopaedia. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 09:53, 7 October 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.