From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reviewing Cheatsheet


Do not remove the elements, but rather strike the text as they becomes useless or irrelevant (i.e write text to be struck) to indicate that this element was verified and found to be alright.

Tasks

Cheatsheet last updated by: (signature)

  • Add :
  • These elements are missing from this article:
  • These lists are missing from this article :
  • Categorize
  • Cleanup
  • Article MoS Compliance :
  • Talk Page :
  • Archive old and irrelevant discussions
  • Consider structuring discussion according to "topics"
  • Sort boxes in this order (consider adding them if they aren't there):
  • If there are more than one WikiProject, use {{ WikiProjectBanners}} and order them alphabetically within the banner.
  • WP 0.5/1.0 Editorial Team,
  • WP Echo
  • Other boxes
  • To do box
  • Archive box
  • Update importance and rating
  • Copyedit :
  • The following sections needs to be copyedited (give reason) :
  • Copyright :
  • Disambiguation :
  • The following elements needs to be disambiguated :
  • Considering referring these section to a main article :
  • The following elements may be too technical for the casual reader, consider

defining and explaining them to non-experts:

  • Expand :
  • The following sections needs to be expanded/created :
  • Infoboxes and Navboxes :
  • The following navboxes and infoboxes could be useful :
  • Merge/Split :
  • Consider merging or splitting these sections with another article,

or merging another article's section with this one (give reason) :

  • Problems :
  • The following problems have been identified :
  • Requests :
  • Consider making a request to these people (give reason) :
  • Update :
  • These sections or statements are out of date :
  • Verify :
  • The following needs to be verified :
  • Wikilink :
  • The following elements needs to be wikilinked :
  • People
  • Experiments
  • First use of unit
  • Dates
  • Miscellaneous remarks :

List of "Fields and Research Areas"

Historically, applied physicists have been useful for military purposes, from calculating trajectories to building the first atomic bomb

I've tried to cleanup the list. Here are some questionable ones:

  • chemical vapor deposition processes : seems like chemistry
  • vacuum tunneling?
  • fiber and guided wave devices: covered under fiber optics, right?

Also, look at Category:Applied and interdisciplinary physics for more stuff delton 05:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC) reply

List of "Institutions/organizations"

Presently lists only applied physics institutions with their own wikipedia pages (see edit by 朝彦). In keeping with WP:NOTCATALOG, would it be better to eliminate this list entirely? I'm not sure, but it does seem that such a list is prone to self-interested additions. Tls60 ( talk) 18:41, 26 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines

" Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation. The Transhumanist 00:03, 9 August 2015 (UTC) reply