From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oraibi, Arizona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC) reply

“Another Pot from Old Oraibi”

The source material does not support the description in this article that the phrase is intended to “ characterize a style of exhaustive ‘thickness’ in ethnographic writing,” but only that a kind of journal article with that sort of title often accompanies the release of such a “thick” ethnography. The source reads:

There was a time when thickness was perhaps synonymous with exhaustiveness, producing the almost unreadably detailed descriptive ethnography, often followed by the famous “Another Pot from Old Oraibi” kind of journal article.

The “Another Pot” reference describes the journal article that accompanies a “thick” ethnography, not the ethnography itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.181.114.109 ( talk) 00:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC) reply