This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Software: Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance). Microsoft Windows: Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (December 2010) ( Learn how and when to remove this message)

Is seems not all of this article's content is specific to Excel, and thus is already covered elsewhere. Couldn't this article be shortened significantly? -- Mortense ( talk) 11:47, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply

This suggestion could be made more useful it were made specific just what is found elsewhere with links to where the duplicate content is located. Brews ohare ( talk) 17:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC) reply

First two references of footnote #9 are currently dead links. 63.156.219.125 ( talk) 19:17, 21 January 2017 (UTC) reply

A kitchen scales (soehnle) indicates at the beginning "18.888" for a seccond and the shows a a regular "0" to start regular measuring. Remember that the similar problem can happen when starting a specific EXCEL computation using extensive precision.

Is that an issue related to this topic -any hint?

-- Gaschroeder ( talk) 19:12, 29 June 2017 (UTC) reply

@ Gaschroeder:, the behaviour you mention is completely unrelated to Excel's precision. When the kitchen scales switch on, all segments of the seven-segment display digits are lit up briefly, before the display settles down to its zero starting position. This is a deliberate feature that provides a visual test that all segments are working. This mitigates errors due to failed segments (for example if the bottom-left segment of a digit fails, a 6 will appear as a 5). - Stelio ( talk) 15:07, 25 April 2018 (UTC) reply