From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Best known for"

"The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) is the oldest stock price measure in use and is what the NYSE is best known for."

Removed. What what sense is the DJIA what "NYSE is best known for"? If this claim has any validity, someone absolutely must explain how it is connected to NYSE. -- Ryguasu 08:51 Dec 26, 2002 (UTC)

Exchange members

It'd be great if someone could explain how people/companies become an "exchange member", what their rights/responsabilities are, and how the trades they make on the floor translate back to how an individual person's trades through a broker translate into action on the trading floor. I don't know enough about it to explain this myself. -- Ryguasu 19:10 Dec 26, 2002 (UTC)

I can't put this encyclopediacally, but:
  • There are a couple hundred seats, that are traded just like stocks. You got a spare US$1,500,000 or so and one could be yours, so you can trade NYSE-listed companies with the big boys (and one or two girls).
    • When I tell my broker to buy me Hasbro, he tells the brokerage's person at NYSE, and he hies himself to the Hasbro specialist broker's booth and buys shares of Hasbro for (he hopes) less than I want to pay for it.
  • As for a company being listed, I don't think there's a quota, but the company has to meet certain standards of solvency and stability.
This is all off the top of my head, and it's not really my field. The NYSE Web site may have more info. -- Charles A. L. 20:57, Nov 16, 2003 (UTC)

Closures

Removed: "This is the longest number of consecutive business days the exchange has ever been closed in its two-century history." after Sept 11. According to the NYSE's own website, the stock exchange was closed for 10 days in 1873, among others. djmutex 21:11 2 Jul 2003 (UTC)

List of companies

Since a comprehensive list of companies listed on the NYSE takes up about a dozen columns of tiny print in the New York Times, is it meaningful, useful, or necessary to name a handful here? -- Charles A. L. 20:57, Nov 16, 2003 (UTC)

I agree, especially as some of the examples seemed to be picked a bit randomly. I've removed them, but added a reference to the DJIA nearer the top that people can link to if they want examples of NYSE listings. Also tried to address Ryguasu's point above about the link between the Dow and the NYSE being tenuous -- the Dow is supposed to be the list of the 30 biggest listed companies in the US, and while almost every big blue-chip company lists on the NYSE they will always be very much associated with each other. ben 10:03, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)

NYSE Controversy

I'm thinking of adding something to this page about the recent criticisms people have been making of the NYSE. The main things I am thinking of are:

  • the specialist's conflict of interest between maintaining an orderly market and making a profit out of it, including the recent SEC settlement with six big specialist firms
  • the NYSE's resistance to electronic trading, and Arca and Instinet's claim that the trade-through rule helps maintain the NYSE's monopoly
  • bit more on Dick Grasso and the compensation committee, plus the board's dual role as regulator and maintainer of a profitable organisation.

Oviously a lot of work needs to go into making sure it remains NPOV by giving the NYSE's arguments against all of these criticisms.

What I'm not sure about is whether to have a separate section about it recent controversies, or to extend the article as a whole and then drop in the issues where appropriate (e.g. explain who the specialist is and what they do, then bring in the conflict). Possibly blending it in would suggest a more NPOV than a separate section, but then again they are pretty big issues and their resolution could end up changing the way the securities industry operates dramatically.

Any thoughts? ben 10:19, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Real exchange

Leading sentence in para 2: "NYSE trades, unlike those on some other more "virtual" exchanges (e.g. NASDAQ), always involve face-to-face communication in a particular physical location."

NASDAQ is not a 'virtual' exchange, it is a real exchange with read bid and read ask prices. This sentence implies some mock superiority to me. Those that trade on the NYSE do not necessarily do it face-to-face, the technical function of the market isn't necessary toexplain what the market is - perhaps a statement saying the market is technically implemented through a 'specialist', rather than a 'market maker' (like NASDAQ, LSE, etc). Happy to draft a link to 'specialist' v. 'market maker' page (have not found any such article on Wikipedia)... Investopedia explains the difference here ( http://www.investopedia.com/university/electronictrading/trading1.asp) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.137.85.47 ( talk) 20:37, 13 August 2004 (UTC) reply

Flag

If someone can add notes about when the ginormous flag first appeared, that would be great. I don't remember ever seeing it in TV footage until after September 11, but it might have been used for a special event or something (4th of July, for instance). From what I can tell, it's not usually there today except for special occasions, but I'm halfway across the continent and it's not exactly on my drive to work (even if I had a job ;-)... — User:Mulad (talk) 06:02, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)

Here's a story about the flag: http://www.zitopartners.com/the-flag-on-the-nyse-facade — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.157.207.146 ( talk) 11:18, 16 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Opening and closing bell

Something should be mentioned about what time the NYSE usually opens and closes. -- AllyUnion (talk) 07:01, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I agree. Is it open on weekends? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.218.161.59 ( talk) 06:27, 17 March 2007 (UTC) reply
Another issue regarding the bell - The NYSE site offers a pretty scant history. Apparently, a gong was used initially, but there has always been a bell at the new (1903) site. Meanwhile, there's no information about when they started allowing and inviting "guest" ringers. The mindless clappers up there when trading opens and closes has always bothered me. 72.177.96.237 ( talk) 23:50, 25 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Merger is intended, not yet effective

The April 2005 announcement was of the intent of NYSE and ARchipelago to merge, and separately for the new entity to become a public, for-profit company. This merger is subject to law suits, and regulatory approvals. As of July 2005 NYSE is still a not-for-profit member owned organization. The formal changes will likely take place sometime in 2006. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.153.255.134 ( talk) 21:52, 29 July 2005 (UTC) reply

1914 NYSE Closure

I am reading a book I stumbled on to at a used book sale entitled "Road to War: America 1914-1917" published in 1935 by New York Herald Tribune correspondent Walter Millis. It is there that I have learned for the first time that NYSE in 1914 had its longest closure-far longer than all the others combined-of 4 1/2 months, although the author states that a vibrant street market on the sidewalk outside the exchange's closed doors quickly emerged.

Your brief comment on this indicates that the exchange reopened in late November 1914 after having been closed since late July (in order to prevent panic selling of Euro stocks according to another source) initially to allow limited trading in bonds and then on a full service basis in mid-December 1914. The part about initial bond trading, however, is accompanied by the comment that this was done to aid the war effort, a statement that only the passage of almost a century, makes it seem not as politically loaded as it should be. Moreover, the first Allied War Loan was not floated privately until late September 1915 via the House of Morgan so the bonds traded could not have been European War bonds, although Morgan had been acting as the purchasing agent for the British's non-munitions purchases in a context, due to the British Navy's supremacy on the seas and its blockade of Central Powers shipping, that favored one side from the get-go and was in fact a contentious political issue at the time itself, during the period of what is described as Colonel House's clownishisly naive peace feelers and shuttle diplomacy.

Why is this significant? Because America was neutral in 1914 and did not enter the war until April 1917. In fact, Millis' book-an example of the isolationaist sentiment of the 30s, but nonetheless a brilliant work-sort of the "Best and the Brightest" of WW1 by someone who lived through it, talks about the ambiguoius and conflicted sentiment in this country, even among key policy players and how Americans-even those in high places like Wilson and Colonel House (Wilson's central advisor based in the White House and a precursor-and sadly also a caricature-of the Kissinger like "national security advisor") were naively manipulated like stereotypical American rubes by the British authorities in a situation that was not at all akin to that faced in the Second World War. Secretary of State of William Jennings Bryan, however, to his everlasting credit, believed in scrupulously adhering to neutrality and filed a formal protest against British violations of American neutrality in January 1915 in the context of the devastating impact on American business due to the loss of the German and Austro-Hungarinan markets particularly that for cotton.

As a matter of fact, notwithstanding substantial pro-British sentiment across the board, the prospect of us joining the war on the side of the Germans on a limited basis as we did with Napoleon in 1812 in order to defend our shipping rights was not an incredible option at least prior to the Lusitania ( RMS Lusitania) episode of May 1915 (another story). Germany in WW1 was not the Third Reich, it was a constitutional monarchy like Britain with vibrant opposition parties that voted for the war during the patriotic hysteria of 1914. Britain, saddled with an increasingly Junker like aristocracy of its own, presided over the largest empire in human history that ruled over places as disparate as India and Ireland with less than kid gloves.

Most ironically, many of the German-Americans in this country at the time were Jewish who hewed to their loyalty to the Fatherland. Jacob Schiff, for example, a stereotypical top-hatted Jewish capitalist refused to join with Morgan, a rabid anti-semite, in floating the Allied bonds. (see also, "House of Morgan" by Ron Chernow). Why, not just because it violated neutrality but because-and we should never forget this-one of the "Allies" was Tsarist Russia, the most autocratic, feudal and viciously anti-semitic regime in Europe at the time with vicious lynch-mob like massacres of Jews called "pogroms" being a feature of their culture and history, a regime Schiff abhored the prospect of aiding.

Consequently, Lord Grey ranted and raved against "Schiff and the Jews of Kuhn-Loeb" that were standing in the way of his bringing the U.S. into the war, a task that was made easy from the beginning by the British Navy's severing of the German and Austrian trans-atlantic cables, British businesses' ownership of the neutral cables and the fact that most U.S. papers' European bureaus were based in London and often staffed heavily by English people causing most US news, already Allied skewed, to go through the British censor. Thus the gross exagerrations-and even outright fabrications-about German atrocities in Belgium etc.

In conclusion and with apologies for the extended polemic, if anyone has more information about the 1914 closure I would appreciate its being posted. Thank you, Tom Cod — Preceding undated comment added 20:58, 19 November 2005 (UTC) reply

Factual error??

I visited this article after reading this bbc article [1]. There is an inconsistency between them and one have to be wrong. See statements below:

NYSE is the largest stock exchange in the world, although its trading volume was exceeded by that of NASDAQ. That is from wikipedia
The NYSE will now become the world's second-biggest publicly-traded stock exchange by market value, behind Deutsche Boerse. That is from BBC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wk muriithi ( talk • contribs) 02:27, 7 December 2005 (UTC) reply

Seat?? What the heck is that?

For historical purpose, a paragraph of ownership arrangement when NYSE was private would be enlightening. This can serve as a good starting point

Also, instead of being owned by its 1,366 members, many of whom rent out their seats on the exchange and can be slow when approving changes, the NYSE will be shareholder-owned.

NYSE members will earn $300,000 (£172,000) for each seat and share 70% of shares in the new company.

I am curious, if a seat is not similar to a share, would it be close to a voting right in co-operatives? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wk muriithi ( talk • contribs) 02:47, 7 December 2005 (UTC) reply

A seat is the right to do business. It's not a share of the business! I suppose you could think of it as a condominium, the ownership of which allows you to trade listed shares with other condo owners. Similarly, you can own (and rent or sell, if it comes to that) a condominium apartment, garage or parking space, or boat slip. If the information above is correct, $300K for a seat is very low, given that a seat sold for $4 million in 2005. Obviously what is happening is that the members are getting stock in the new corporation plus a bit of a sweetner in the form of a cash payment up front. Archernewland ( talk) 20:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Gallagher's Evening Exchange?

I am reading a book about Jay Gould that describes a trading venue on Wall St in the 19th Century known as "Gallagher's Evening Exchange" where stocks would be traded after hours. Does anyone have any further information about this? In addition, there is discussion of NYSE trading on the "Open Board" and "Closed Board" at that time. The only reference to it online that I could find follows below. Tom Cod 21:54, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply

______________

"The first new exchange to emerge after the start of the Civil War was the Public Stock Board. Under the leadership of George Henriques, the Public Stock Board opened in late 1862, when it began holding two afternoon sessions. The exchange was located in the basement of 23 William Street, hence it acquired the nickname "the Coal Hole." As with Gilpin's, a group of disgruntled broker/traders left in March 1864 to form the Open Board of Stock Brokers.

Unfortunately for compulsive traders, the Gold Room and the Open Board kept only regular business hours, and even the curb market was only open until about 6:00 p.m. But a lack of daylight apparently did not stop the most determined traders. They simply moved uptown. The New York Times first mentioned evening trading at the Fifth Avenue Hotel in November 1863, although other sources say it started in 1862. Traders probably began massing there in May 1862, about the time that the bull markets in gold and stocks began in earnest.

Perhaps because of pressure from the hotel management to stop trading on the main floor, a broker named Robert H. Gallaher [sic] rented the basement (which the New York Herald later likened to the Black Hole of Calcutta, suggesting massive overcrowding and suffocating conditions) and charged twenty-five cents admission to his new Evening Exchange. Trading began at 5:00 p.m. and went until midnight. Gold coin was traded, as were all the major stocks listed at the NYSE and the Open Board. Stocks were called for bidding one at a time, in the same way as at the NYSE. Gallaher was successful enough that the Times was reporting transactions on a daily basis beginning January 19, 1864. Business grew so fast that in March he moved the exchange to a larger facility on Broadway near the corner of 23rd Street. There are two conflicting views of this location. According to the Herald, it was a "barn-room," but in his book The Big Board, Robert Sobel states that by day it was the Republican party headquarters. Gallaher claimed that the location could accommodate 1500 people. This move was temporary, as the Evening Exchange moved to 164 Fifth Avenue in June, and then back to Broadway and 23rd Street in November. Gallaher finally erected a building at Fifth Avenue and 24th Street, which was completed by April 1865.

Gallaher was preparing to organize his Evening Exchange into a joint-stock company when the combined efforts of the NYSE, the Open Board and the Gold Room forced him out of business by denying their own members access to the Evening Exchange. The primary catalyst for the action against the Evening Exchange was the failure of the private banking firm of Ketchum, Son & Co. on August 15."

-"Sleepless in New York" by Tom Kalinke, Museum of Financial History

Nonsense

Something is clearly wrong in the first part of the article. A lot of nonsense in there. I have no time to fix it :/ Jobjörn 10:32, 17 May 2006 (UTC) reply

High trade failure rate of the NSE

Now I've recently heard in work that the NSE's older auction style system of trading is responsible for a failure rate hich can be as high as 20% and that all of this can be attributed to human error which would be eliminated if it switched to an electonic trading platform such as that used in the UK. does anyone know anything about this? - BTW, when i say "i heard in work" i mean in a seminar in work, not off the office bore in the canteen so i guess it must have a basis in fact? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.43.13.101 ( talk) 15:23, 18 August 2006 (UTC) reply

1817-1914?

This article provides *no* history of the NYSE from 1817-1914. This article should provide a much fuller history of the institution its supposed to describe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThaddeusFrye ( talk • contribs) 18:02, 26 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Number of companies

So exactly how many companies are in the NYSE? The intro paragraph only says second largest compared to the NASDAQ, but not a number, which would be better. -- 70.111.218.254 03:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Trading floor picture

The trading floor picture of the NYSE is from the early 1990's, I happened to notice this because I am a regular viewer of CNBC and that is not how the floor looks today. Can someone please update that photo?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.4.140 ( talk) 05:50, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Operating Hours?

What time does the NYSE trading floor open and close? What days does it operate? -- 1000Faces 11:38, 12 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Monday through Friday 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time. As part of the Euronext merger, we may see a much longer trading day (16 hours or so.) (At least that's what Thain has indicated) — Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:37, 21 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Self-regulating?

Regarding the addition of Category:Self-regulatory organizations, this category will need to be removed shortly, as NYSE is merging its regulatory side with that of the NASD. — Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Financial markets Template

I tried and failed to put the financial markets template into this page, can someone who knows wiki formatting please put it in so it looks decent? 19:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Done. -- Elipongo ( Talk| contribs) 08:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC) reply
Removed. That template cluttered up an already overly cluttered section. Remember, not all readers have huge screens. You can probably use a navbox at the bottom to achieve what you wanted. Zain Ebrahim ( talk) 07:48, 26 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Unexpected Closurs

Just a thought, but shouldn't information about unexpected closure(s) be included here somewhere, maybe just a paragraph in the history section or something. it was a pretty big deal when Rage Against The Machine caused the closure in 2000. And to my knowledge that was the first (and only?) time it happened... - DevAnubis 11:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Questioning the RATM inclusion as a bit pop culture-y/hipster cute. Seems out of place within the general context of the article. Agree closures might be interesting but would that open the door then to all service interruptions? That would be almost its own page. Ziquemu ( talk) 02:25, 22 June 2011 (UTC) ziquemu reply

Another picture of the building

I've uploaded another picture of the building. I think it's better than the ones shown on the page, but I'm biased since I took the picture.

I'd be pleased if you'd want to use it on the page. I haven't added it myself since there are already plenty of pictures and I'm not sure which one to remove to make place for mine.

Gfk 23:21, 1 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Stockmarket-nyse.jpg

Image:Stockmarket-nyse.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC) reply

i removed the picture.
Gfk 18:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Gallery?

Aren't there a lot of pictures when having the actual size of the article in mind? How about a gallery at the bottom? TobykwAn 11:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Lead paragraph

I find the lead confusing. If Bombay has 4800, NASDAQ 3200, and NYSE 2764 listings, then NYSE will be the third largest by number of listings, but the lead says it is the second largest by this criterion. Have I misunderstood, and could the lead be rewritten more clearly? -- Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 22:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply

I removed the assertion that it was 2nd highest - that makes no sense to me given the other information. The problem we now have is that the lead says that the NYSE has a different number of listings than the infobox. Which is right? Anyone know? Zain Ebrahim ( talk) 07:50, 26 August 2008 (UTC) reply

New York Exchanged

american owned or american based companies only? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.104.67.222 ( talk) 16:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Companies Formerly Listed on New York Stock Exchange Category

I would like to start a category on Companies Formerly Listed on New York Stock Exchange. Any suggestions on a name (or does it exist already). Thanks. Americasroof ( talk) 12:36, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply

"Black Wednesday"

I really don't think that "Black Wednesday" was a name given to October 13. Those kinds of names are only really used a few years or even decades after the event. Unless someone can source that their is a concensus on this name, I'm deleting it. JakeH07 ( talk) 21:48, 22 October 2008 (UTC) reply

"securities" vs "companies"

The first sentence says that nyse has "2,764+ listed securities". The second says that it has listings for "3,200 companies". This is very confusing. Each company's stock is a security and the only securities the exchange handles are stocks, so why are these numbers different? Bobbyi ( talk) 14:37, 24 October 2008 (UTC) reply

A single company may issue several different securities - e.g., it may have preferred shares and common shares, and it may have several series of preferred or common shares. So the number of companies and the number of securities should be different; but the number of securities should always be larger than the number of companies. 137.186.53.25 ( talk) 16:54, 29 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Coordinates

{{geodata-check}}

Please note that the coordinates in this article need fixing as:

your wrong. red dot is precisely off the mark. your welcomeSuperscript text (Previous comment added 2008-10-26T20:59:59 by 75.172.166.138 .)

From today, there were three separate sets of coordinates in the article. I eliminated the Coord template from the bottom of the article (in edit mode), since we could use either of the infobox coordinates to display at the title. I embedded Infobox NRHP into Infobox Exchange, allowing the potential to reduce the coordinates further to one set only. The locator map pin (the "red dot" from the above comment) apparently only works with the "lat_degrees long_degrees" format, so I chose that format for the coordinates. BrainMarble ( talk) 15:35, 17 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Update

  1. of companies listed and market cap need updating (spring 2009) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.207.140 ( talk) 16:50, 12 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Founded in Infobox?

Where did the "founded" part of the infobox go? How come it doesnt show? Tri400 ( talk) 16:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Good question. Good thing someone caught this in less than a year... right. Fixed. Gary King ( talk) 01:38, 10 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Flag

There is nothing related with the huge american flag that is there. Is the flag always there? Why? Who had the idea? Which measurements it has? All I'm wondering should be added. -- Catalaalatac ( talk) 15:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC) reply

I would have to add, if you're looking for a picture to illustrate the architecture of the building, and the columns are particularly mentioned in the caption, a picture with a flag covering practically all the columns and a good part of the entire facade is really not the best choice. 71.176.111.94 ( talk) 17:52, 20 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Ring of opening bell

I think that the article should have a separated section dedicated to the ceremonial ring of the opening bell, its meaning, history and so on. I was looking for it and I just found the caption for one of the images. -- Dia^ ( talk) 10:21, 15 October 2011 (UTC) reply

I do not know how to remove the two older logos (the blue ones). Those are no longer in use. Current logo should be kept. Sposer ( talk) 03:20, 15 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Error in last line of 3rd paragraph, which has no edit button. I think $5 billion should be $11 billion.

Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_162-57560197/intercontinentalexchange-to-buy-nyse-for-$8.2b/Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

Kristinelark tilde, tilde, tilde, tilde — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kristinelark ( talk • contribs) 03:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Libor Administration

Removing a recently added sentence about NYSE takeover of Libor administration because it is not directly relevant to the New York Stock Exchange. This page is about the stock exchange, its parent company is NYSE Euronext which is creating a new subsidiary, NYSE Euronext Rates Administration Limited (see announcement at http://www.bba.org.uk/media/article/bba-to-hand-over-administration-of-libor-to-nyse-euronext-rate-administrati), a London-based, UK registered company, regulated by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority. (see chief executive of the BBA's article at http://www.cityam.com/article/libor-now-has-new-administrator-our-reforms-have-gone-much-further). This subsidiary will administer Libor from early 2014, while the New York Stock Exchange is a separate subsidiary of NYSE Euronext. The change in administration is covered on the pages for NYSE Euronext and Libor. -- Whizz40 ( talk) 10:52, 21 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Removed bio-sketch from Notable events section

I have removed the following two paragraphs from the tail of the "Notable events" section, and copied them here. Reason for removal: they look like a biographical sketch for an individual, and as such they do not seem to have proper place in the article.

On 18 August 2014 Sam Jordan most recently served as CFO. In 2013, Mr. Sam Jordan responsibilities were expanded to also include oversight for global operations and information technology. He held a variety of positions in corporate finance in America and abroad while at The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation.

Mr. Sam Jordan has served on the boards of ProQuest, the Madison Square Boys and Girls Club, and Westchester County Association. He earned an MBA in Finance from the McCombs School of Business of The University of Texas at Austin, with CPA Certification in the State of New York, and holds a Corporate Law in Accounting from the University of Delaware.

glopk ( talk) 13:24, 28 June 2015 (UTC) reply

July 8 Computer Glitch

Would that warrant its own article? Iamahashtag ( talk) 01:53, 9 July 2015 (UTC) reply

History

Is it overkill that we have three separate history sections? History, Notable Events, and Timeline. Kendall-K1 ( talk) 01:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Sleep Now in the Fire

It seems to me we have way too much detail on the "Sleep Now in the Fire" incident. This is the longest paragraph in the "Notable events" section, longer than the 1929 crash paragraph, and about as long as the corresponding section of Sleep Now in the Fire. Readers can click through to the main article if they want this much detail. Kendall-K1 ( talk) 18:33, 28 September 2015 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on New York Stock Exchange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:56, 1 January 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on New York Stock Exchange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:34, 27 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Founding date of the NYSE

The New York Stock Exchange traces its founding to the signing of the Buttonwood Agreement ( /info/en/?search=Buttonwood_Agreement) on May 17, 1792 not the creation of the 1817 constitution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.110.3.4 ( talk) 15:30, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on New York Stock Exchange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 14:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Euronext has been separated from ICE

Euronext has been separated from ICE per Euronext#Listing_of_Euronext_and_separation_from_ICE, and so we should update the Euronext info in the lead section. -- Mathieu ottawa ( talk) 22:52, 28 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Has it been done?-- Dthomsen8 ( talk) 16:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC) reply

NYSE companies inherently notable?

Are NYSE companies inherently notable on Wikipedia? I would suspect so, but I welcome other opinions.-- Dthomsen8 ( talk) 21:56, 26 March 2017 (UTC) reply

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on New York Stock Exchange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Use of ICE Registered Trademarks

This page contains registered trademarks of Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. ("ICE") or its affiliates that are being used without an indication that they are trademarks. On behalf of ICE, we suggest the following be added as the last sentence of the lead section:

“The terms New York Stock Exchange®, NYSE®, The Big Board®, Intercontinental Exchange®, NYSE Composite Index®, The Closing Bell®, and NYSE ARCA® are registered trademarks of Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc. or its affiliates.” — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.175.3.8 ( talk) 21:07, 11 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): TCheung10, Storant. Peer reviewers: Storant.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 05:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC) reply

SCAC

There is plenty of ways to dial in a more attractive P&L... SCAC being one 8 figures a week is the average of a logistics brokerage dealing in DOD loads, any further ideas or concerns please contact me I generally will guarantee market share growth and quarterly numbers if I have an incentive, honking is great but my Oynixa doesnt understand and needs to take a look at ://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/news/tom-york-on-business-crowley-s-new-etug-ready-to-make-green-w Crowleys Etug Ill be learning about and hopefully somehow get a more private way of "crossing the mainframes" or what have you. Have a great day open Amtrak doors... 198.49.31.146 ( talk) 16:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:New_York_Stock_Exchange&oldid=1204660132"