This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
New York City Police Department article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been
mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Update The Chief of Department serves as the senior sworn member of the NYPD. Kenneth Corey, a longtime NYPD veteran,[30][31] is the 42nd individual to hold the post.[32] which prior to 1987 was known as the chief of operations and before that as chief inspector.[33] to The Chief of Department serves as the senior sworn member of the NYPD. Jeffrey B. Maddrey, a longtime NYPD veteran,[30][31] is the 43nd individual to hold the post.[32] which prior to 1987 was known as the chief of operations and before that as chief inspector.[33] JohnN NYC ( talk) 23:24, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
add motto "New York's Finest" SpaghettiGesus ( talk) 23:07, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
The NYPD has a history of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct, which critics argue persists into the present day. So just a few posted citations and the NYPD automatically has a history of corruption? No counterpoint at all? Or at least something like " It is alleged that the NYPD has a corruption of corruption and brutality?" Kind of ruins the reputation of cops who have served the public with exemplary records. Why is it okay to paint all cops with one brush? If you do that with a race or religion, painting people with one brush it's reprehensible. 2600:4041:50ED:4900:E97F:53F5:6901:847C ( talk) 21:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
& paddies ? Not a word. What is that, woked as can be. (why do we not learn about the - traditional - over representance, one might say, of irish-american-cops in the Department. There were literally cop-generations of irish descent. Known fact. Even banal statements of that kind should be worth mentioning to give a half-way realistic picture. In a short overview. -- 2001:A61:5DD:D01:F1CB:DDCB:19EC:4D5 ( talk) 17:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)