Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Northamerica1000 ( talk · contribs) 13:44, 7 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Support – The article appears to meet criteria at Wikipedia:Good article criteria. The article is complete, informative, well-written and comprehensive. Information is properly sourced with inline citations, and there doesn't appear to be any original research within it. The prose is neutrally worded and encyclopedic. Northamerica1000 ^(talk) 13:44, 7 April 2012 (UTC) reply
• I agree with Northamerica1000's evaluation of this article:

1. Well written?: Pass

2. Factually accurate?: Pass

3. Broad in coverage?: Pass

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass

5. Article stability?: Pass

6. Images?: Pass

MathewTownsend ( talk) 19:40, 7 April 2012 (UTC) reply