This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Oklahoma Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have updated this list from using the weekly updates from July 1 2005 through April 27, 2007. As of April 30, 2007 this list and the Oklahoma COunty list should be complete. Dsmdgold 15:42, 30 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Updated through the June 22 Weekly listing. Dsmdgold 16:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I've started replacing county lists by NRIS-based tables, with careful attention to capturing valid information reflected in old lists in place. I'll try to note ay research issues or editing needed items here. doncram ( talk) 19:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Atoka county research issues

• In Wapanucka vicinity, Old Faucett Well appeared in the old list. It is not in NRIS-based table. Was this delisted, or never NRHP-listed, or what? There are other delisted items in the same county, now noted in a separate table. doncram ( talk) 19:12, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The current version of the NRIS database available for download (which also includes sites that have been removed as well as those nominated but never listed) does not include a site by this name. -- sanfranman59 ( talk) 21:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Caddo county research issues

research issues in Caddo County

• Anadarko and vicinity
  • Black Beaver's Grave is not in NRIS-based list, unless it is covered by another name (perhaps an archeological site one?)

The latest NRIS database available for download shows Black Beaver's Grave as having been removed from the Register in 1999. -- sanfranman59 ( talk) 21:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC) reply

• Bridgeport vicinity and Hydro vicinity
  • Bridgeport Hill-Hydro Route 66 Segment (also in Canadian County) is not in NRIS-based list. If the listed area does span 2 counties, then this is a duplicate that needs to be noted at state-wide list page (and i put in an entry there). If the listed area does not span the county border, but rather is just "close to" a town in other county, then the duplication topic footnote at state-wide list is to be dropped. doncram ( talk) 23:59, 9 May 2009 (UTC) reply

I removed this listing from the Caddo County table. It is not included in the Caddo County table produced by the Elkman tool. I also checked the latest NRIS database available for download and it's only listed in Canadian County there also. -- sanfranman59 ( talk) 21:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC) reply

An error then — the description says that it extends from Hydro to the US 281 spur. Hydro is not in Canadian County, so it can't be only in Canadian. Nyttend ( talk) 19:01, 22 July 2009 (UTC) reply