This   level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Museums Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Smithsonian Institution: Archives of American Art Low‑importance This article is within the scope of Smithsonian Institution WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Smithsonian Institution and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Smithsonian InstitutionWikipedia:GLAM/Smithsonian InstitutionTemplate:WikiProject Smithsonian InstitutionSmithsonian Institution-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Archives of American Art. United States: Massachusetts / Boston Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts. This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Boston (assessed as High-importance). Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of the Art of the Americas wing (interior and exterior) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Boston may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

I am endeavoring to make significant improvements to this page. I have added an infobox, articles on the branch museum in Nagoya and director Malcolm Rogers, and will proceed to translate the copious information on the German-language version of this article. Cjs2111 06:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Wonderful that someone has been smart enough to have created this section. These are often the folks who do the heavy lifting behind the scenes. Bravo. MarmadukePercy ( talk) 01:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Who owns the MFA & collections? Are they municipal? Private, like the Metropolitan? Public/private partnership? I wuold love for someone to clarify this. Albiart ( talk) 16:29, 20 February 2014 (UTC) reply

I think we should add a section about this robbery: https://www.nytimes.com/1975/04/15/archives/early-portrait-by-rembrandt-stolen-in-armed-robbery-at-boston-fine.html SSR07 ( talk) 22:14, 16 October 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SSR07 ( talk • contribs) 21:32, 13 October 2022 (UTC) reply

The Community relations section reads like a list of a few unencyclopedic community programs interspersed with TripAdvisor-type complaints about poor service. Per WP:UNDUE and WP:NOT, most of this section does not fit the tenor of the topic. Cf. Art Institute of Chicago for an example that reads much better. —  AjaxSmack  23:24, 14 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Agree. It desperately needs rewriting SSR07 ( talk) 01:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I made a go at rewriting it to some extent, mostly reorganizing the information for flow. I'm also open to it being trimmed instead. Grk1011 ( talk) 14:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Regarding [ this diff], could @ Randy Kryn: please explain the rationale for keeping the photo in a section where it isn't discussed? The new location is directly alongside prose speaking to it. Elsewhere IMO it just appeared as decoration. I'm not sure why this would be a controversial move to any extent. Grk1011 ( talk) 14:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, and happy 250th anniversary of the tea party. The statue is, of course, a major piece of the collection, the section the photo has been in for a long time. All images of artworks on Wikipedia can be called 'decoration' but are actually visual desciptors of the topic. In this case, one of the museum's most prominent artworks has a solid place in the 'Collection' section. I don't know if it's mentioned in the text there or above, if so it should be (EDIT: added it, thanks for focusing attention on this, it is one of the museum's prominent pieces). Randy Kryn ( talk) 14:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC) reply

It wasn't mentioned in the text there before, but I think it still has more relevance in the new location, which directly addresses indigenous-related art and its relation to the museum. The length of time that it was in a certain spot of the article is not particularly relevant. Also, just above here, folks have commented on what a disaster this article is, so it really does need a full rethinking. Photo placement and all. Grk1011 ( talk) 15:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I'd added it (see my edit to the post above). A disaster? Not so much, although the one section they refer to seemed very long and undue. Even if the entire article being a disaster becomes consensus, an image of the museum's most prominent statue would likely appropriately stay in the collection section. Randy Kryn ( talk) 15:25, 16 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I appreciate that you have a preference for its location. I disagree, but maybe some others will chime in. To me, it makes more sense to have the photo in the large text section that has no photos, versus jammed in higher up. I'm not sure what device you're accessing Wikipedia from, but the quantity of photos early in the article has an impact on how this page renders for readers; I was hoping to address that by moving some of the photos to other sections where they are discussed in detail. Grk1011 ( talk) 15:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC) reply