Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Where would one fine an article or section on the multi-choice question format for examinations etc? Is there one? Richard001 04:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Why is medialternatives.com, self-identified as a fringe blog, being used as the main source of this article, when there are a plethora of solidly mainstream sources available? Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 16:33, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The COI editor is urged to confirm whether the article meets the requirements for deletion and if so, to make their request at articles for deletion. |
I am the originator of the copy for the MultiChoice Wikipedia page (I am employed by the company and have declared this fact). I've been informed of the copyright issues (even though we are the copyright holders) and have been advised not to edit the existing copy but to post my recommendations here. I'd like to suggest that we delete the page so that I can create a new one that will be in keeping with Wikipedia's stipulations. PeterPieglMultiChoice ( talk) 10:24, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
You can make this request at WP:AFD, but before you do, please do your absolute best to ensure that the article meets the requirements for this process. If in doubt, it's usually best to assume that it doesn't – and then work yourself back towards believing that it does only after a thorough research of the requirements. Regards, spintendo 11:39, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
I believe my recent edit of the page should assist with the notability issue. MultiChoice has recently listed on the JSE and there is also the ICASA, KSS issue regarding transfer of broadcasting licence. As an aside, MultiChoice Group includes ShowMax, which has its own Wikipedia page. Might that also be considered for notability? Wyatt Tyrone Smith ( talk) 18:37, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
merge division into parent company--articlet o be merged has insufficiently reliable sources for a stand alone article DGG ( talk ) 15:44, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Strong keep as it is a different operators, logo, works and should be kept since more than 2,6000,000 search in Google. Maintenance tag is OK. ( F5pillar---/ 'Messager🖋📩) 07:15, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
I paid for my dstv account but it's still doesn't work Mogau matlou ( talk) 17:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Why are you not loading all episodes of Binnelanders on Catchupp? 105.244.223.201 ( talk) 21:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)