Mount Rainier National Park was nominated as a Geography and places good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 16, 2021). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This   level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Volcanoes Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as High-importance). Protected areas Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "Important".

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: The News Tribune special on park history (1999)

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 February 2020 and 6 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Oliviaproffitt00.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 04:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC) reply

How is Mount Rainier the fifth-oldest park? - Talk to you later, Presidentman ( talk) Random Picture of the Day 20:24, 17 May 2010 (UTC) reply

• In general, the history section requires expansion, including a discussion of how Mount Rainier became a National Park and the political fight surrounding that move. Racepacket ( talk) 12:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC) reply

I just added a subsection about the creation of the park, although not with much about the political fight--just a bit of general context. One thing I couldn't quite figure out was whether Muir's 1888 ascent was the 5th or 6th on record. The National Parks book says it was the 6th, but most of the climbing chronology websites seem to list it as the 5th. It's apparently not clear whether the summit was reached on a few early attempts. Fred Beckey merely says that the 1888 climb was "the fourth ascent of the Gibraltar route", which doesn't exactly resolve it. Pfly ( talk) 08:31, 25 July 2010 (UTC) reply

I think stating Rainier as the 5th National Park is a bit misleading. Yellowstone was the 1st in 1872, but then Mackinac National Park was created in 1875, two years later, General Grant, Sequoia, and Yosemite were all created at the same time in 1890, but then Mackinac was returned to the state of Michigan in 1895, so for five years there were actually five National Parks. When Rainier was added in 1899, the number came back to five parks, but I wouldn't say it was the fifth park, it was the sixth. You can find this information on the NPS site, as well as Wikipedias own List of of areas in the NPS system.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.37.74.194 ( talk • contribs) 00:36, 2014 November 22‎

Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). -- Walter Siegmund (talk) 02:54, 22 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Thank you Walter. I had an account years ago, but the passwords been lost and is apparently not recoverable. I found that when I made changes, even small ones and cited the reasons, there were people that seem invested in the way it was written and would reverse them. Thus, I choose to make suggestions on the talk page, and if an editor would like to incorporate my suggestions they are welcome to... or not to as they please. In this case, I can say that Mount Rainier National Park was actually the 6th national park created by an act of congress. Since Mackinac National Park had been disbanded at the time of its creation, you could say it was the 5th of the five parks designated at the time. I don't think it would be right to call it the 5th oldest either, since technically General Grant was re-designated as part of Kings Canyon National Park, and ceased to exist as a park in its own right at that time. Based on that, one could say its actually the 4th oldest park, after Yellowstone, Yosemite and Sequoia National Parks.

@ SounderBruce:, instead of "There are three companies that are authorized to operate mountain guide services in the national park; initially RMI Expeditions was the only one at Mount Rainier.", what if we say " RMI Expeditions was the only company authorized to provide mountain guide services in the national park for more than thirty years. (insert bbc ref) As of 2024, three companies provide guide services, and fifteen mountain guide services are authorized one trip per year." [1] When I read the "three" in the recent edit but only one was named, it made me curious who the others were. The NPS site names them, but it might seem a bit promotional to name them in the article (while RMI's 30 years is significant enough for a mention), but the 15 solo-trips seems worth mentioning. It'd be nice to find a source that discussed why the NPS went from only one company to opening the field so much to others, wouldn't it? Schazjmd  (talk) 23:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Schazjmd: Went ahead and added that information, as well as what I could glean from an older newspaper source from when climbing was opened to other companies. Someday I'll have to split off the activities from the attractions/areas in a future expansion. Sounder Bruce 02:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC) reply