This   level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Urban studies and planning Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2021 and 24 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Katya Olsen.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 01:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC) reply

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2018 and 15 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ogunjimb. Peer reviewers: JasonHunt1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 04:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC) reply

I am taking a stab at restructuring and rewriting this article. Several major issues that are apparent include:

• No references for the vast majority of content here
• No distinction or explanation of the difference between "mixed use development" in the generic sense of zoning (or lack thereof), versus "a development" that is, a project or (the UK term) "scheme" which is planned as mixed-use
• Grouping of the material into sections.

Some of the changes I have made:

• Added explanation of the difference between "mixed-use development" in the generic sense of zoning (or lack thereof), versus "a development" that is, a project or scheme which is planned as mixed-use
• Moved the section about Asia into the list of mixed-use development projects
• Split the list of examples of mixed-use development into those that are purely zoning versus those that are projects/schemes

- Keizers ( talk) 16:32, 1 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Great steps taken there! Thanks (even though belated). -- Horst-schlaemma ( talk) 10:15, 22 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Just to echo user:Horst-schlaemma, I wish there were more editors here with an interest in the topic. Ottawahitech ( talk) 08:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC) reply

A suggestion: at the end of the end of the Social benefits paragraph, a sentence states "Safety of neighborhoods is in turn increased as people stay out on the streets for longer hours." Either this claim needs a citation or a qualification. Somebody1226 ( talk) 03:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC) reply

... but this is how wikipedia creates vicious cycles of information sourcing, by keeping unreferenced original essays for years and infesting the internets with them. Staszek Lem ( talk) 21:56, 25 July 2017 (UTC) reply

what does a pointless single-use tourist attraction have to do with mixed-use?! reference to the vessel should be removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.154.17.134 ( talk) 16:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC) reply