| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mixed-sex education article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The "informal" use of the term "coed" is actually pejorative. By implicating that only a woman is a coed, it reflects an era where women were not permitted access to higher education and thus an attempt to emphasize this fact.
I do not advocate for the removal of the term in this sense, I just think that the sexist nature should be pointed out. Coed in description of a coeducational residence/program/institution is good. Coed to describe a woman is bad. -- Waterspyder 02:17, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
- I'd just as soon have the sentence about "coed" striken entirely from this article entirely and just leave it to a seperate article. In the US for those born after the massive wave of integration of universities all "coed" means is a female college student of traditional college age. Jon 15:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- But that doesn't answer the question of why the term is used for females only. Why couldn't a male student at a coeducational school be considered just as much of a "co-ed" as a female student? JackofOz 05:17, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Male students just aren't considered co-ed in current US speech even if they are attending a formerly all-female school. It's not the wikipedia's job to make value judgements anyway. Jon 17:56, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- That still doesn't answer the question at all. Moreover, does anybody have any idea among whom the use of the term originally developed?
- Boys at formerly male-only institutions?
- Girls beginning to attend formerly male-only institutions?
- Female-only institutions, or people thereat, losing students to these co-educational institutions?
- Some other group entirely?
- Moreover, how much use does the term get nowadays? -- Smjg ( talk) 11:33, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- That still doesn't answer the question at all. Moreover, does anybody have any idea among whom the use of the term originally developed?
- I have never heard this term used in Canada. I've only heard it on US TV shows and had to learn what it meant. 163.239.218.24 ( talk) 01:42, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
I was just looking at this sentence: "Numerous professional organizations require that the gender-neutral term "student" be used instead of "coed" or, when gender is relevant to the context, that the term "female student" be substituted."
This completely ignores the possibility that what is relevant is the fact that the person is at a co-educational institution, rather than the person's gender. The section doesn't comment on how the term is actually used in practice, and I furthermore don't think I've ever heard actual use of the term (possibly as a result of not being American). But if the reality is that in practice it means "a female student, as opposed to a male student, at a co-educational institution" rather than "a female student at a co-educational institution, as opposed to one at a female-only institution", then the section needs to address this, rather than ignoring it. Is there anybody out there that has experience of the term's use and can help with this? —
Smjg (
talk) 18:51, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- I am an American, and I have been aware of this term for about four decades. I have never once seen it used to differentiate female students at coeducational vs. single-sex institutions. The possibility never even occurred to me until you mentioned it.
- I have added a sentence that reflects the results of an evening's search (see below), but I think the hair-splitting is distracting, and I would be happy if someone else removed my addition.
- An admittedly unscientific but good faith Google Books search for this women's-college-vs.-coed-school use yielded almost nothing until I searched for works that contain both "coeds" and "women's college." A few comparisons of single-sex and coeducation emerged. For example:
- 1949 LIFE magazine article
- 1963: "'Increasing numbers of girls--women's college students as well as coeds--'seemed suddenly incapable of any ambition, any vision, any passion, except the pursuit of a wedding ring,' the book says"
- 2001: "Furman's beauty queens were all Woman's College students (rather than coeds from other colleges) chosen for their physical attractiveness"
- 2004: "'Co-'. . . theoretically implies that either men or women could be 'coeds.' Yet 'coed' is defined as 'a young woman being educated at the same institution with young men.' She is the 'co-' to the education of men. Ironically, a woman student at a formerly women's college would be a coed at that institution as well."
- An interesting one is a 1973 quote from the president of Wellesley College, who is careful to specify "women" coeds, recognizing that "coed" ought to mean both men and women but never does:
- Without the specific context of comparison, however, the noun usage meaning women (as opposed to men) at coeducational institutions (or even a woman of college age, school having nothing to do with it)--often in contexts of sexuality or physical attractiveness--overwhelms the other. A few samples:
- 1968: "To many a student the most appealing subject in college is a coed. A coed is usually less interested in what she gets out of college than whom." <--note that whoever wrote this quotation does not consider a coed to be a "student"
- 2000: "unless it is also used evenhandedly of males and females, coed as a noun will continue to be still another term that defines women as abberations"
- 2006: "The Sexy Coed is the kind of role both of us love to cast"
- 1959: "A coed is exotic with mascara on her eye lashes, demureness in a sweater, and 'the future homemaker' with a can opener"
- 1927: "upperclassmen turned their attention to the coeds. . . . The men would draw circles in chalk on the walk and then grade the girls according to general attractiveness"
- Google n-gram searches on "coeds" and "the coed" and "many coeds" and similar phrases targeting the noun use show such usage to peak around 1970 and then decline. Changing the spelling to "co-ed" moves the peak to the late 1930s.
- The noun use turns up a lot in titles of pornographic texts and films, but I leave that research to others. I am highly skeptical that even one such use will care anything about what school, if any, the woman in question supposedly attends. I offer some tame examples:
- Now you know just about everything I can tell you about American usage of the term as a noun. I was surprised to find more instances of the coed-institution-vs.-women's-college distinction than I expected (honestly, I expected zero), but what I did find was negligible and seems to have no effect on the waning use and increasing unacceptability of the noun.
- 2600:8807:5508:E100:9085:496D:183C:72B7 ( talk) 05:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
How do we decide what schools should and should not be listed on this page? It seems to me that a comprehensive list would span many, many pages, and there are currently no criteria for what schools appear. I'm seeing schools on there that I have never personally heard of, while other schools that I think should be mentioned are missing. I am tempted to add the dates I can source-cite, but not delist any colleges until a consensus is met. In particular, why is Rose-Hulman listed while Caltech and MIT are not? I feel all three of these should be included. I'm currently writing a paper on the gender disparity in scientific and engineering fields, and I'm finding this list useful in background on the lack of access for women to the basic knowledge needed to conduct scientific research up until the 1960's, and even beyond.
Also, if we define "coeducational from start" and "became coeducational", then the entire list of all higher education universities must be contained in the union of those two sets. Perhaps, instead, "coeducational from start, prior to 1970", and "became coeducational" would be better categorization, since it appears to be a "default" that the majority of colleges founded since 1970 have been coeducational, and thus their creation is no longer worthy of mention in an article about coeducation. -- ElizabethFong 19:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
On this page, Florida State is listed as beiing coed since 1882, but on [ [1]] it's listed as only being coed since 1947. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.190.99.24 ( talk) 00:11, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- The Florida State University article gives a nice background on its coeducational history, but in particular it says: "On May 15, 1947, the Governor of Florida signed an act of the Legislature returning Florida State College for Women to coeducational status and naming it The Florida State University." Based on the information at that article, it was originally a men's college, became coeducational, changed to a women's college when the University of Florida became a men's college, and then reverted back to coeducational. Based on that, I would say that FSU has been continuously coeducational only since 1947, and this article ( Coeducation) should be updated accordingly. Beginning 00:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
JHU Med School did not go co-ed in 1893, but the first woman did become a Doctor that year from the grad school, by earning a PhD in Geology. For the reason that it was not co-ed from the begining, I am shifting JHU into the 'year went co-ed' category, and changing the listing to Grad School. source Desertsky85451 00:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Maybe this is kind of nitpicky (or is it nit-picky?), but I was wondering why "coeducational" or "coed" is written half the time in this article, and "co-educational" or "co-ed" is written the other half. Is there any sort of consensus, or is this just a reflection of the different preferences by different contributors? Merriam-Webster seems to prefer not hyphenating, but I don't know whether it's that big of a deal to try to go in and enforce one spelling or the other. It just looks weird to see things like "Coeducation in China" followed on the next line by "Co-education in Hong Kong", as if the political distinction also created a hyphenational distinction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OmarGosh ( talk • contribs) 17:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Could be another one of those American English vs British English things. Jon 18:00, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't feel qualified to add this material myself, because I know very little about it, but I know that women's education was undergoing many changes in Europe in the 19th century as well, one example being Jagiellonian University, in Krakow, Poland, which was awarding degrees to women as early as 1824, and gradually opening its colleges and faculties to women through the turn of the century. It was easier for an Austrian woman in the early 20th Century to get a university education in Krakow than in Vienna. Is there anyone, perhaps among our European contributors, who can add to this article?
Perhaps the same could also be done for other regions of the world, by those better informed than myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.49.66.68 ( talk) 13:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Coeducation does not specify in its name that it refers to the mixing of genders within teaching. "Mixed-sex education", it is much more suitable term, since not only is the name also used more commonly, but it is more accurate in its meaning, and also also fits in with the format laid out by the name of the article Single-sex education. Please discuss. An alternative would be "Multi-sex education". Hamletpride ( talk) 17:12, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think this is Canadian/British vs. U.S. issue. I have never seen "mixed-sex education" used in the U.S. (it sounds a bit racy to my American ears), whereas "coeducational" is very commonly used in the U.S. In fact, when my search came up with an entry entitled "Mixed-sex education), I did a double-take, before figuring out what this was. 211.225.33.104 ( talk) 04:52, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
I removed "The oldest originally mixed-sex school still in existence is Tenison's School in Croydon, South London, which was established to provide education for "ten poor boys and ten poor girls" in 1714." Friends School, Saffron Waldon was founded in 1702, although it was in several places during its history: 1702-1786, Friends School & Workhouse, Clerkenwell; 1786-1825 at Islington Road, Islington; 1825-1879 at Croydon; from 1879 at Saffron Walden. Vernon White . . . Talk 20:14, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Why do we need the full lists entitled "USA mixed-sex higher education institutes", "Dates USA educational institutions became mixed-sex", and "Canada"? They seem to be unnecessary and too long for an encyclopaedic article. No-one is really going to read through all them, and it makes the article seem very bloated and irrelevant to non-USA readers. Alternatively we could go for a split. -- Cowplopmorris Talk Contribs 02:38, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
I am not sure why this was renamed from coeducation. Coeducation is the more commonly used term on both sides of the pond. Take these searches for example. 'Mixed-sex education' produces 3,510 Ghits here. Compare this with a combination of 'Coeducation' with 151,000 here and 'Co-education' 170,000 here. The difference is stark. TerriersFan ( talk) 20:01, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Putting in a group of boys and girls at the age of puberty leads to transfer their attention from learning about the competition aspects of the opposite sex, and the immaturity and the significant psychological differences lead to conflict (silly jokes, provocative behavior, competition for a boyfriend or girlfriend ).
The pace of maturation for both sexes, and other treats only at the age of maturity. Seven-years-old girls ahead of boys in terms of physical, but are lagging behind in terms of capacity of concentration, coordination and ability to write.
The harmonization of the methodology of teaching for both sexes in the mixed classroom enforces the need to impose a pattern of behavior across gender group ignoring phisical and psychological differences between boys and girls, even in such aspects as temperature in the classroom .
It is easier to motivate boys to learn through competition, and the girls by the contact and interaction.
Critics also suggest a better outcome of single-sex schools compared with coeducational schools .
Coeducation supporters respond that most research indicates that although there are minor differences in individual brain structure of male and female, the resulting differences in the perception and processing of information by the boys and girls are much smaller than the individual differences between children of the same sex. As for adults, differences in intellectual performance between the sexes cease to have any meaning.
Conducted in the United Kingdom, where the two concepts together education, research has not shown that boys and girls choose different subjects or have a better performance in science, depending on whether they learn at mixed schools whether to pursue the concept of diversified education. The conclusions of these studies are such that there is a very good school based on both of these concepts, but not because they are for boys only, girls only, or for both sexes. The main factors are the ability of students, the environment, which is derived from and qualified teachers. Authors of this study examined in detail the arguments of supporters of a diversified education and found that the arguments are usually inadequate or selectively presented.
This is the example of research conducted since the early 90. to prove that children from different schools on the grounds of sex are achieving better results than children from mixed schools. On the argument that co-education is the wrong solution, because boys and girls learn in different ways, advocates suggest that many studies have shown that small differences in the perception and processing of information that may be held at the girls' and boys do not affect the way you see the effectiveness science.
In contrast, the argument that, in classes of older disabled disconcentration is associated with the element of dealing with sex, coeducation supporters respond that the intercourse with their own gender, it may lead to tension, which greatly hinder the process of further education. Violence and homosexual behavior appear more frequently in the schools for boys than in mixed schools. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.4.25.174 ( talk) 14:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Sex education? Isn't this article supposed to be about men and women (or boys and girls) in same schools? 85.217.15.109 ( talk) 10:52, 30 April 2011 (UTC
I second what 163.239.218.24 said. I had to learn what coed meant, and then I discovered this article lists its use as informal, does that mean that its use should be avoided in Wikipedia? (except of course when it is the topic of discussion or some quotation). I got here because I encountered it being used on the Sara Bareilles article: "...she was a member of the co-ed a cappella group Awaken a Cappella...", and now I don't know if she was a member of an all-girls group or a mixed-sex group. :-S -- Dave.haku ( talk) 17:11, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- It's true that it is listed in dictionaries as informal (my says "informal" - not "slang"), but it is -- or was -- very common in the U.S., and has no commonly used alternative. To get a rough idea of the frequency of its use, look at https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=coeds%2Cco-eds%2Cmixed-sex&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=17&smoothing=0&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Ccoeds%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cco%20-%20eds%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cmixed%20-%20sex%3B%2Cc0 . 211.225.33.104 ( talk) 05:10, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
"The first mixed-sex institution of higher learning in China was the Nanjing Higher Normal School, which was renamed National Central University and Nanjing University. For millennia in China, public schools, especially public higher learning schools, were for men. Generally only schools established by zongzu (宗族, gens) were for both male and female students. Some schools such as Li Zhi's school in Ming Dynasty and Yuan Mei's school in Qing Dynasty enrolled both male and female students." This unclear and even confusing. In any case, how about some dates? Did the NHNS take women hundreds of years ago or starting around 1910? Somebody who knows the facts should set us straight. 211.225.33.104 ( talk) 05:15, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Mixed-sex education. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060428110902/http://www.ed.gov:80/offices/OERI/PLLI/webreprt.html to http://www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/PLLI/webreprt.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 14:57, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Shouldn't it be "mixed-sex" education rather than "Mixed-sexed"? Royalcourtier ( talk) 20:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 5 external links on
Mixed-sex education. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121222003458/http://beatl.barnard.columbia.edu/learn/documents/coeducation.htm to http://beatl.barnard.columbia.edu/learn/documents/coeducation.htm
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091106111903/http://www.fandm.edu:80/x22560 to http://www.fandm.edu/x22560
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091105040810/http://www.fandm.edu:80/40yearsofcoed to http://www.fandm.edu/40yearsofcoed
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110520013124/http://www.wickedlocal.com/westford/archive/x2136193253 to http://www.wickedlocal.com/westford/archive/x2136193253
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061023193654/http://beatl.barnard.columbia.edu:80/learn/documents/coeducation.htm to http://beatl.barnard.columbia.edu/learn/documents/coeducation.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 01:34, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Mixed-sex education. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060428110902/http://www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/PLLI/webreprt.html to http://www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/PLLI/webreprt.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
I would suggest removing the names of specific mixed-education schools in different countries. Perhaps it might be more useful to include the percentage of schools that are co-ed in those countries instead? Scowch ( talk) 19:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mixed-sex education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/PLLI/webreprt.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 14:34, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 March 2022 and 13 May 2022. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Kbroderick24 (
article contribs).
If a dog school is a school for dogs, a boys school is a school for boys, a girls school is a school for girls... if a coed is a girl- then why isnt a coed school a school for girls? And how does coed refer to non-education... what is the ed for in coed band?
I am from New Zealand and coed always meant boys and girls and only in the context of schools. You had bands (which might be boys and girls), all girl bands, all boy bands, but no coed bands... they aren't a school. 120.21.145.173 ( talk) 20:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2024 and 15 May 2024. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Jshinnn (
article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Jshinnn ( talk) 03:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
There appears to be original research in the Coed as Slang section. Is there a source for the speculation about the motives of usage guides? Just` Existing 20:02, 10 March 2024 (UTC)