This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Higher education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: South Carolina Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Who is the Chief of Staff at MUSC?

Where? There is a chief in each school and department. The head of the school is President, not Chief of Staff. He is Ray Greenberg. -- Kainaw ^(talk) 16:18, 3 March 2006 (UTC) reply

David J. Cole is the President of MUSC. Barton L. Sachs is Chief of Staff at MUSC Medical Center. Doctor No9 ( talk) 19:03, 27 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Medical University of South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110513162303/http://academicdepartments.musc.edu/com1/about/index.htm to http://academicdepartments.musc.edu/com1/about/index.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120325023931/http://www.musc.edu/catalyst/archive/2003/co11-14pr.htm to http://www.musc.edu/catalyst/archive/2003/co11-14pr.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:52, 24 January 2018 (UTC) reply

User:Dewitt Travis is edit warring [1] [2] [3] to add content supported by documents uploaded to Google drive [4] this is not an acceptabe method of sourcing as they have been told before. Theroadislong ( talk) 06:55, 3 May 2018 (UTC) reply

hennsonsc has begun an edit war to add or change information in this article. This includes:

• Adding the chair of the board of trustees and the university's street address in the infobox. This information is trivial and unnecessary; this is an encyclopedia article, not a school directory or university webpage.
• Changing the lede to describe this institution as a "research university". This institution is [ https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/lookup/view_institution.php?unit_id=218335 classified as a "Special Focus Four-Year: Research Institution" in the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, the standard classifier of U.S. colleges and universities among both scholars and Wikipedia editors. If this were a research university, it would be classified among "R1: Doctoral Universities – Very high research activity" or "R2: Doctoral Universities – High research activity."

@ Hennsonsc:, please revert these edits unless a new consensus is established. You cannot simply revert your new, preferred edits into an article over the objections of other editors. Bold, revert, discuss is the typical way to address disagreements; inserting additional reversions of your own while the issues are being discussed or in lieu of discussion is edit warring which is not acceptable. ElKevbo ( talk) 19:37, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The recommended infobox template for a university is Infobox University, which references the following in it's documentation:

• Chair should be used to identify the chair of the institution. I'm not sure why utilizing the recommended infobox would be trivial or unnecessary.
• Address is relevant as Google pulls information to their knowledge panels based off the correct information being present on Wikipedia. We don't have the address listed, so this page isn't matching with the MUSC knowledge panel.
• Carnegie deems the Medical University of South Carolina a research institution, in the same fashion as it does University of California, San Francisco. I've noticed you edited that page, but did not remove research university from their infobox, but insist on removing it from MUSC. Can you clarify what your designation is as it doesn't seem to be standard across your applications in alignment with Carnegie?

hennsonsc ( talk) 20:14, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

We are not required or obligated to use every parameter in the infobox. Please tell us why readers must know the name of the institution's "chair" (as distinct from its president and senior academic officer).

We're not responsible for what Google foolishly chooses to do and not do; if they want an institution's street address, it would be much easier to pull it from IPEDS. This is an encyclopedia article, not a directory or phone book entry. (An older version of the template or a commonly used set of text for adding it to an article specifically noted that the "address" parameter was controversial; I don't know what that was removed as it remains true...)

Good catch with UCSF! I've edited the infobox and lede of that article to reflect that institution's classification. ElKevbo ( talk) 00:48, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

One could just as easily argue why one would need to know the president or provost as well. It depends on the perspective of the seeker of the information as to why they would need to know either.

I never said we were responsible for what Google "foolishly" chose to do. If Wikipedia shouldn't have addresses, Wikipedia shouldn't have any page with an address available. Additionally, it shouldn't provide geolocations either. However, you and I both know it has been a longstanding practice. I'm not sure why you expect someone to justify why an address for an organization shouldn't be presented, but you act with authority as if you don't have to justify removing it. What purpose does not presenting it serve to anyone? If you personally don't find it relevant but it is relevant to the subject, why are you removing it?

You’re in academia. Why do you deem research institutions not research? It’s truly the core at what research institutes do.

hennsonsc ( talk) 01:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

If you opened a discussion at WT:UNI or Template talk:Infobox university recommending that the provost parameter be removed, I would support that motion. But the high visibility of college and university presidents makes it highly unlikely that a proposal to omit that person from this article's infobox or nearly any other would be unlikely to succeed. In any case, you still haven't answered the fundamental question that I've asked several times already: Why is it essential for readers to immediately know this information?

As far as I can tell, the address parameter is very rarely used for US colleges and universities. It seems to primarily be used in the rare circumstances where the institution only occupies a single address but I don't know if it's used even in all of those instances. We tend to avoid directory-like information in Wikipedia articles with the general view that it's not information appropriate for an encyclopedia article.

In my experience both in (US) academia and Wikipedia, the phrase "research institute" or "research institution" is not often used especially when something more specific is available. In this case, "medical school" is completely appropriate as many (most? all?) medical schools do indeed conduct research. If this specific organization conducts an unusually high amount of research or is otherwise notable for its research, that should be discussed in the article with perhaps a brief summary included in the lede if appropriate and helpful for readers. ElKevbo ( talk) 04:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply