Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: – Grondemar 16:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC) reply

It looks like everything from the first GA review was closed out. I made some minor copyedits but otherwise have no concerns.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b ( MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   GA PASS. Congratulations! – Grondemar 16:58, 3 April 2010 (UTC) reply