This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Mandalay Bay article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mandalay Bay Events Center should be merged into this article since the events center is not large enough for its own article. -- Ben 16:06, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Why is it called Mandalay Bay, when the actual city of Mandalay in Burma is not located on the coast? 108.254.160.23 ( talk) 22:39, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
I may have missed it, but I didn't see any reliable source in the article for number of rooms. Note to user @69.162.1.58: personal knowledge is NOT acceptable in Wikipedia, even if you're an employee of the hotel. I've found a room count of 3,211 on Mandalay Bay's website -- normally not an acceptable source, but it should be OK for something like this. -- Larry/Traveling_Man ( talk) 22:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
I notice that the Mandalay Bay tram is mentioned in the introductory paragraph. The number of hotel rooms in the building is also mentioned. But the largest mass shooting in United States history, which took place in the building, is not mentioned. Is the tram really more important than the shooting? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.23.8 ( talk) 18:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Adding a subsection for "2017 Las Vegas shooting" has introduced an error into the "History section". The "History" section lists items chronologically, which is proper. However, adding a subsection for the 2017 Las Vegas shooting inadvertently includes the January 2020 sale within that section. There are solutions, such as:
Pending something which doesn't break the section, I've undone the change. I have a possible fix, but I'd like to keep that separate from the reversion.
Now about that possible fix: reword the paragraph to facilitate a link to the main article, as well as remove unnecessary detail. Perhaps (with references, of course):
Thoughts? -- Larry/Traveling_Man ( talk) 05:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)