This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
A fact from Malcolm (Macbeth) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 April 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
My initial thoughts was that the article was greatly lacking in detail. I went looking, and found
Banquo, a GA on another character from Macbeth. The comparison is illuminating.
This article is near entirely a plot summary of over 700 words. This plot summary randomly includes quotes from the play, most of which are not useful. I would recommend that they all be removed. By comparison, the Banquo article has a two-paragraph "role in the play" section which contains no quotes and amounts to no more than 324 words.
Macbeth is a work by Shakespeare, so there should be extensive literary analysis over the centuries. This is well shown at Banquo, which contains numerous citations to literary critics and journals and an "Analysis" section almost as long as the entirety of this article. By contrast, this article's sourcing is restricted to a few general studies and Cliff Notes, which per
WP:RSP is only "usable for superficial analyses of literature"; I would expect more than superficiality from a Shakespeare GA.
There is only one sentence, in the lead, about the connection to the historical King Malcolm, and there is absolutely no discussion of performances.
Therefore, this article is a borderline
WP:QF because it is so far from addressing the main aspects of the subject (
GA criterion 3a)); I will put it on hold for a week, in case the nominator feels they can turn it around.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk) 19:49, 21 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Actually, I've had another look, and there is just so much material that isn't discussed or even touched on in this article that I'm going to quickfail it as being a long way away from
GA criterion 3a), and that's not even touching the
WP:WAF issues. I would recommend adding sections like those at
Banquo before renominating.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk) 12:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.