From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move Baconsfield Park section?

Beaconsfield Park is listed as an example of Macon in popular culture. I am not sure if that classification makes sense; I'm not sure it should be included in the entry on Macon (although I am not opposed to it if other's think it should be(.. I have tried to remove it; however, this change was reversed. If people think it is important for the Wikipedia entry on Macon, please create an entry for it. I personally think it would make the most sense as its own entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.109.35.76 ( talk) 15:12, 5 November 2021 (UTC) reply

I don't know why a Supreme Court case would be defined as Popular Culture. I definitely don't agree that the section should be removed from the page entirely, as it is supported with numerous sources, but not enough for it's own article. I could support it being moved to the History section or the Parks and Rec section of this page though. Light-jet pilot ( talk) 00:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC) reply
It's been almost a year with no other input, so I went ahead and moved the section. Light-jet pilot ( talk) 21:51, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply