Lucky Guy (play) was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the
good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
It's not obvious from reading the lead alone that this was Ephron's final work because its posthumous. I appreciate you can easily work this out from reading her article, but for GAs you shouldn't need to do this.
I think this needs expansion, and more insight into the writing process. An article that says "The play is the final and posthumous work of Ephron, who died the year before its production" isn't telling the reader anything more than what they can infer.
Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 08:47, 16 September 2013 (UTC)reply
I have expanded this section as much as I could. However, unlike most works, the writer was not around to tell her story at the time when the public would be asking about it. I.e, once they could see that it was a likely and eventual Tony-nominee, she was already dead. Her writing process for this work is not likely extensively logged in the public domain.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 02:53, 17 September 2013 (UTC)reply
Plot
* "Mike McAlary" should just read "McAlary" per
WP:LASTNAME
"including the tainted Tylenol case" - why was this case "tainted"? I think this paragraph just needs to explain why these points of McAlary's career are important, so the reader understands
The article says the act focuses on the Jane Doe rape case, but the source given (
[1]) doesn't seem to mention this
I think this section still needs improvement. The paragraph now starts "Mike McAlary, from 1985 to 1993, bounds from one New York City newsroom to another". As well as duplicating the
WP:LASTNAME problem (albeit now in a different place), the text makes him sound like
Superman. I think you just need to tone the language down a bit and explain things in a more neutral and factual manner. The section is now tagged as requiring expansion, and justifiably so. Have a look at
She Has a Name, which is probably the closest GA I can find to this subject, for some ideas on what you can include.
Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 08:47, 16 September 2013 (UTC)reply
Themes
The quotations here are the opinions of the individual reviewers and should be attributed at such.
This section is quite short, and could probably be expanded. When did pre-production start? Do we know why the
Broadhurst Theatre was chosen as the venue? Do we know why Tom Hanks specifically chose this play as his broadway debut? Most importantly, do we have any background into Ephron's writing of the play, and how it developed into production after her death. How much of it, if any, was she involved in?
* "Directed by George C. Wolfe, Tom Hanks starred as McAlary." sounds a bit confusing. Suggest "It was directed by George C. Wolfe, with Tom Hanks starring McAlary"
I'm not sure this section needs to be quite so long. Give a general summary of the critical reception, and include the most pertinent comments on all sides of opinion.
Awards and nominations
The individual Tony awards need to be cited (just procedural this one as the LA Times article has got them all)
I think it's mainly expanding on existing content that is the issue here. Looks all solvable within a week, so I'm putting this on hold for now.
Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 14:40, 13 September 2013 (UTC)reply
I have expanded the article a bit. I am at a loss on how to fill out the plot any further. I am also not so sure I want to chop the critical review section. This just might not make it over the hump. If it will make a difference I would take a closer look at the critical review, but given my inability to find a good source on the plot I am not sure what I can do.--
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 07:52, 17 September 2013 (UTC)reply
I'll tell you what my gut feeling is, which is that there are good sources on this that haven't been written yet. It didn't run on Broadway for that long, all things considered, and these things need time to gain attention after the initial buzz, if it happens at all. If this transfers to the West End successfully with high critical acclaim, and gets picked up elsewhere, then writers and journalists will start to spot a demand for people to know the background, at which point we can cite it. I just feel that it isn't there yet. How would you feel about leaving this article as B class (it's a lot better than when I started the review, granted) and chalking it down to experience?
Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 14:00, 17 September 2013 (UTC)reply
Congratulations to TonyTheTiger, who improved this article greatly. I agree with the GA reviewier that, even once the Plot section is filled out that this won't be quite ready for GA class yet, but it will certainly be a good B-class article. Excellent research work! --
Ssilvers (
talk) 19:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)reply
Lead image
Is there a theatre poster available for the lead image? Can we use
this? --
Ssilvers (
talk) 20:05, 17 September 2013 (UTC)reply
Plot
The script for Lucky Guy is published in the collection of Ephron's works, titled The Most of Nora Ephron (Knopf published October 29, 2013, ISBN-10: 038535083X). See the amazon.com listing at [
[2]].
Flami72 (
talk) 13:38, 15 November 2013 (UTC)reply
I will not buy it, but I have a request in at my local library, so I will get it, probably within the week/month, to have on loan for 3 (?) weeks. I'll try to re-write the plot based on the script, time permitting. (But I don't have the skill or temprament (SP?) to help get this to a GA otherwise!)
Flami72 (
talk) 17:06, 15 November 2013 (UTC)reply
I know that you are not asking me, but I'll answer anyway--I do not know if Ssilvers will buy the book or if he can get it from his local library, but I'll guess that the book is readily available in most decent-sized libraries. (TTT, probably you can get it where you live.)
Flami72 (
talk) 17:06, 15 November 2013 (UTC)reply
I have no plans to get the script. Thank you, Flami, for being willing to do the plot synopsis. BTW, everyone, I do not watch this page, but I came over here because I saw that Tony pinged me. Happy editing, all! --
Ssilvers (
talk) 17:14, 15 November 2013 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on
Lucky Guy (play). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I have just modified one external link on
Lucky Guy (play). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I am quickfailing this article per QUICKFAIL (3), "has valid cleanup banners". The plot section has contained
Template:Expand section since September 2013, and this appears a valid concern to me. –
Teratix₵ 16:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.