From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assess for Schools

tell us more, refs reqd, pics, see below, welcome Victuallers 19:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC) reply


  • And blatanly POV to boot; I'll see what I can do. I'll probably cut it down severely. NigelQuinine BlatherToil 03:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  • I'm doing a major overhaul of this article (throwing everything out and starting from scratch, basically); however, it might take me a day or two. Just don't delete the page while I'm doing it. NigelQuinine BlatherToil 03:35, 19 August 2006 (UTC) reply
  • I have just finished the first phase of my overhaul - the lead and the history. I'll try to do more on this article in the future. NigelQuinine BlatherToil 01:58, 27 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Lovett.logo.JPG

Image:Lovett.logo.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC) reply

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 23:36, 21 June 2013 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Lovett School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:15, 11 January 2016 (UTC) reply