This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance). Buses Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I've been doing a bit of research, and I think that this entry could do with some more detailed information about the LADOT.

The Department's annual report, Controller audits, and information from the City Clerk and other sources can give a much more useful entry. 69.231.50.226 ( talk) 04:30, 9 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Is it the 12th or 23rd, the template states it was added the 23rd. -- .::Imdaking::. ^{Bow | DOWN} 03:55, 23 September 2005 (UTC) reply

Yes, the 23rd is in a link that always updates itself to the current link. See my comment on Bishonen's page. paul klenk ^talk 03:58, 23 September 2005 (UTC) reply

And the template will remain until someone with the expertise and a very good reason removes it. paul klenk ^talk 03:59, 23 September 2005 (UTC) reply

Don't worry, klenk, yours truly(wait...I take that back). I am working on it, as we type. -- .::Imdaking::. ^{Bow | DOWN} 04:16, 23 September 2005 (UTC) reply

as in rewriting -- .::Imdaking::. ^{Bow | DOWN} 04:16, 23 September 2005 (UTC) reply

Klenk, the website I got the info from was www.ladottransit.com

Like many articles, this text is mirrored on many sites. It doesn't matter. What matters is its copyright status. Please address yourself to that. paul klenk ^talk 04:44, 23 September 2005 (UTC) reply

I have removed the {{ copyvio}} tag from this article. Whilst I can see that some sentences (and there are not many in the article) are copy-pasted, it is my understanding that such small amounts of work, on e.g. the scale of a sentence are not inherently copyrightable. This article also includes other information that may be taken from elsewhere, it is hard to tell, but it is certainly not taken from the given source. Thus, I do not think it infringes copyright from the source listed. A more detailed investigation may be in order, however, along with a repost to WP:CP. I'm not an expert on these things, however. - Splash ^talk 02:55, 27 September 2005 (UTC) reply

It wasnt taken from the given source -- .::Imdaking::. ^{Bow | DOWN} 03:24, 1 October 2005 (UTC) reply

Image:LADOT logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Dash logo2.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC) reply

If anyone cares to properly add this image to the page...

I'm bad at layout and I've forgotten certain Wiki commands. -- AllyUnion (talk) 09:35, 18 April 2008 (UTC) reply

I would like to let everyone know that the bus fleet information on the LADOT page lacks a source and it's unnecessary to have on this page. I will remove the bus fleet sections for DASH, Commuter Express, and Cityride because these sections are causing the page to clutter. I voted for removal of the bus fleet sections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thecleanup ( talk • contribs) 22:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Los Angeles Department of Transportation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140611233056/http://cityclerk.lacity.org/cps/pdf/govtglnc.pdf to http://cityclerk.lacity.org/cps/pdf/govtglnc.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:59, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply