This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. See also:
WikiProject Trains to do list and the
Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
Yes, I would definitely either split it in two or maybe make relevant entries under the various railway lines listed. It's a very very long list indeed! Regs,
Khani100 (
talk) 08:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)Khani100reply
I have removed the {{prod}} tag which proposed that this article be deleted, because I think that this article has merit and so should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here as notification. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article as that process is only to be used when there is no opposition.
Warden (
talk) 12:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose splitting. At the time of the post, the article's style, formatting and layout have been significantly changed and improved, and it makes more sense at this time to keep all of the information in one list article per these changes. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:59, 24 April 2012 (UTC)reply
I am removing the split tag because the reasons for the tag have been addressed.
Op47 (
talk) 20:51, 20 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Most trains removed
Hello. As you know, im the one who created this page. And you also know that the list i created had a loooot of trains mentioned.. and now.. only about 10% of them are mentioned.. Please either mention all or remove the rest. Thank you. --
Anirudh Emani (
talk) 09:33, 9 May 2012 (UTC)reply
It appears that only trains that have Wikipedia articles are listed, from what I've ascertained. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:30, 2 June 2012 (UTC)reply
Well, lots of trains, that have good quality wikipedia articles have NOT BEEN listen over here.
Godavari Express,
Visakha Express and
Falaknuma Express, for example. They are all very famous withing the state of
Andhra Pradesh. There are several other named trains of Indian railways that have not been listed here. This article still needs lots of work. Just saying. --
Anirudh Emani (
talk) 10:14, 14 August 2012 (UTC)reply
Merge proposal
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was speedy close, as the source page has been speedily deleted.
NmWTfs85lXusaybq (
talk) 23:58, 10 November 2023 (UTC)reply
I propose merging
List of named passenger trains in India into
List of trains run by Indian Railways. I think the content in Passenger trains web page can easily be explained in the context of Indian Railways as both are having same motive and this article just needs more trains improving the page from passenger train page, and a merge would not cause any article-size or
weighting problems in Indian Railways Page.
Taj04 (
talk) 11:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
