This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of state and territory name etymologies of the United States article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
List of state and territory name etymologies of the United States is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On the etymology for the state of Colorado it states that the meaning of the word is "Colored river, presumably referring to the Colorado River", from my recollection, and the wikipedia article on Colorado, I thought it meant "The Color red" or "reddish in color" etc., can anyone confirm or dispute this? Thunderbolt16 18:30, Apr 12, 2004 (UTC)
Idaho: can anyone confirm the double aspiration in "ee-dah-how"? Would not "ee-da-how" be more accurate? - MPF 21:57, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Was there any reason for the page being dark blue? It wasn't very readable so I changed it. If there was a reason for it then please revert. Angela 22:22, Oct 4, 2003 (UTC)
Thanks, btw, for adding more specific things to it. I read a book that is dated back to 1974 so I clued that there was some more things that have been restored. Anyone knows what Hawaii means, or is it still unknown ? // Rogper 23:21, 4 Oct 2003 (UTC)
I believe some of these need a little checking, or at least some alternative derivations. See
http://www.statehousegirls.net/resources/symbols/names/statenamesorign/ and
http://www.rootsweb.com/~neresour/OLLibrary/Montgomery/mahx025.htm for example. It gives different kings that Carolina was named after.
Bill Bryson also contends that
Idaho is a made-up word.
DJ Clayworth 18:29, 16 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Hmm. This list disagrees with what is at the head of Minnesota, though I don't know Dakota, so I couldn't say what's right — Mulad 02:12, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Shouldn't there be links to the entities that the states were named after, e.g. Missouri after the Missouri River? Chl 04:46, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Is there any cite for the name of Louisiana being from King Louis, or is it just a guess? I ask because there is an area in Denmark named Louisiana, and the state may have drawn it's name from there. Then again, I don't know where the name of that place comes from. -- Smári McCarthy 21:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Louisiana is named after King Louis, according to the CD-ROM "History" which provides an overview of world history and American history. King Louis was in fact the king of France at the time. Also, it was a French man, La Salle, who first named it.-- Beezer137 ( talk) 00:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
What about some cool dude making one? Hasbro 21:01, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
In several notes, the (commercial) online discussion website Wordreference.com and its forum are quoted as a source. Can a commercial website and a forum open to non-professionals and amateurs be considered an authoritative source? -- 84.173.52.163 04:27, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
I always though "Arizona" was from Spanish, arido zona (arid zone). Seems to make sense, too. 128.138.131.250 22:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
im pretty sure it is spanish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.170.14 ( talk) 08:11, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
I still think that it's a portmanteau of two Spanish words and not Basque or some Native name. AmericanLeMans ( talk) 19:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
The article is correct. Reasons to accept that Arizona does not come from Spanish árida zona or something similar:
Folk etymology is a popular pastime throughout the world. Often, as in this case, a folk etymology depends on unlikely inferences, or on bending the rules of the supposed source language, e.g. making zona and árida swap places. -- ℜob C. alias ALAROB 19:26, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Oregon has a separate article for the discussion of its name that was split out from the Oregon article. Would it make sense to link to it instead of Oregon in the first column of the table? Or else add some sort of "see also" to the Oregon section? Katr67 ( talk) 18:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Although De la Warr could have originally been De la guerre I have not seen any proof or mention of this anywhere. Could someone check? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.70.93.26 ( talk) 17:25, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
I have removed the new etymology given by DLinth for the state of Virginia, which read, "After a regional Native American "king" named "Wingina," 1584, modified later that year by Elizabeth I of England to "Virginia", perhaps in part noting her status as the "Virgin Queen."". I will explain my reasoning here.
1. To begin with, I'll quote what his source, George Stewart's Names on the Land (1945, pg. 22) has to say:
"When the captains returned, their report went to Sir Walter [Raleigh], and he took it to the Queen. In it they wrote the name of the whole country as Wingandacoa, and of its King, Wingina. Then, it may be, that spelling spurred the Queen's thought, and she remembered her own virgin state, which her poets celebrated. Also, that far-off, sweet-smelling lay untouched and virgin, waiting to be possessed. So while Sir Walter stood by to approve and applaud, the Queen remembered her Latin, and spoke a word of proper form for the name of the province, which was a "virgin-land". Thus when the account of the captains came to be printed, the sentence ran 'The king is called Wingina, the country Wingandacoa'--but also was added, 'and now by her Majesty, Virginia.'"
Now, while this is straying into original research of sorts, I'll note that this is nothing more than a just-so story; Stewart presents no actual evidence that any of these events or decisions took place. It makes for a good story to describe the Queen's emotions and thoughts, but that doesn't make it historical fact. The brief except quoted from the captains' report, to me, doesn't imply that the names "Wingandacoa/Wingina" and "Virginia" are in any way connected. The except simply says that the area surveyed was called (by some) "Wingandacoa", and that the Queen called it "Virginia". No direct mention of her reasons, or any suggestion that she was prompted to name it that by the similarity between "Wingandacoa" and "Virginia". So my first reason for reverting this etymology is that the source in question doesn't actually present evidence for the claim, but rather a story about how things might have happened. This isn't really enough reason to revert, though; so my other reasons shall follow:
2. The source is from 1945. A source being older than others doesn't necessarily disqualify it, of course, but if all more recent--and also apparently 'reliable'--sources give a different etymology (see #3 below), then it would seem that the older source has not been accepted by others. Unless there's good reason, it seems to me that multiple recent sources should overrule a single outdated source.
3. The following are all sources I would consider quite reliable, and all give the etymology originally given on the page:
These are my reasons for reverting the new etymology. -- Miskwito ( talk) 21:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
"Five are named after monarchs: three British kings, an English queen, and one French king." Does anyone know what this is referring to?
The state named after a French king must be Louisiana, after Louis XIV.
So that leaves four states to be distributed between "three British kings" and an "English queen". Among the "three British kings", I guess we must include George II (for Georgia) and Charles I (for the two Carolinas). But who is the third king? I wondered if James II was meant but it is stretching things to say that New York was named "after" him (as the list says, it was named after the city of York in honour of him, and he wasn't King at the time). And as George and Charles have taken three states between them, there aren't enough states left for a third king if we are to leave at least one for the "English queen".
And who is the English queen? The one that springs to mind is Elizabeth, for Virginia (and indirectly West Virginia). But Virginia isn't really named "after" her, as opposed to in her honour. And it leaves out Henrietta Maria (for Maryland). On the other hand, if Henrietta Maria is the "English queen", why is she "English" while her husband Charles I is "British"?
I have amended the text accordingly to try to make it clearer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidLDN ( talk • contribs) 20:44, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
This Featured List uses a self-published book as a source (see User:Kaguy, who created a now-deleted article on it - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.S. State Names: The Stories of How Our States Were Named). Rd232 talk 11:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Great article. Unfortunately, though, the table can be a bit confusing when there are multiple possible etymologies for one state (e.g. Arizona). The stacking of rows is a bit disorienting. Is there are a way to maybe put double lines in between each state, or alternate row colors? I just feel like the divisions between states should be more pronounced to help readability. TremorMilo ( talk) 08:14, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
The wording here isnt accurate. The name doesnt derive from the Nahuatl name Mexico because the name Mexico came from the Nahuatl name of the people, the Mexica. Of course it is possible that both the name of the place and the people derive from a common root, such as the name of the god Mexi, but the name of the people definitely came before the naming of the land, so to say the name Mexico comes from the Nahuatl name of the land is incorrect. The line which reads The name Mexico comes from Nahuatl Mēxihco should be corrected to The name Mexico comes from Nahuatl Mēxihca, the Aztec people who founded the cities of Tenochtitlan and Teotihuacan. Mdw0 ( talk) 07:05, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
I'm a bit confused by the states whose names are said to be from Latin--is this to suggest that the name was _originally_ Latin? For instance, Georgia. Is "georgia" a Latin word? Was a Latin word ever actually used for the name of Georgia? If it says Latin because the name itself was transmitted through Latin (from Greek as the article states) that seems a bit ambiguous. I think it would make more sense to just state from what language the state's supposed original name was (not going into its deep etymology when the word does not actually refer specifically to the territory of the current state). Theshibboleth ( talk) 03:29, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I wonder what exactly means "Date of First Original language" and "Year of First Original language". Does it refer to the first usage of the word where the name of the state came from? I think it should be more clearly written.-- Arnaugir ( talk) 18:09, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
There are a few problems with the undetermined origins 1. Utah's etymology seems to have been settled.So why does the map disagree? 2. Oregon's etymology is not settled. Why is only one etymology there?
There are a few problems with the undetermined origins 1. Utah's etymology seems to have been settled.So why does the map disagree? 2. Oregon's etymology is not settled. Why is only one etymology there?
There are a few problems with the undetermined origins 1. Utah's etymology seems to have been settled.So why does the map disagree? 2. Oregon's etymology is not settled. Why is only one etymology there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexschmidt711 ( talk • contribs) 15:44, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
The name "Maine" comes from French, called after a namesake region in the Loire country (Pays de la Loire) in western France. The name was likely given by early French settlers, or the later Acadians. Le Anh-Huy ( talk) 04:54, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 22 external links on List of state name etymologies of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:06, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 24 external links on List of state name etymologies of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015026994254%3Bview%3D1up%3Bseq%3D19{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/topics/wisconsin-name/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:08, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of state name etymologies of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:49, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
In both the map and the article's prose, why is Uzo-Aztecan a separate category consisting of just one state (New Mexico), and not within the category "other Native American"?
Besides, the prose says that there are five states in the "other Native American" category (without naming them), while in the map just four states are colored as such: Alabama, Alaska, Oklahoma and Texas.
Also, I think that, at first sight, Hawaii is barely noticeable in the map due to its pale color, the white background, and the much darker colors of the other states. -- Theurgist ( talk) 18:10, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
@ BilCat: Could you please explain why do think, there is no place for the link Columbia (personification) in the table for DC? Though the name is based on Christopher Columbus, the name is not "District of Columbus" but Columbia! In the protected article of Columbus there is no hint, no link how his name went to be the personification of "America", so it is necessary to explain here the Columbus—Columbia forms of names. 2001:4C4C:20A1:C400:0:0:0:1000 ( talk) 10:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Osomite 🐻 (hablemos) 22:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Osomite 🐻 (hablemos) 22:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
I suggest that we state in the etymology section that the language of its etymology is 'Arabic via Spanish,' rather than 'Spanish,' since it ultimately and fundamentally derives from the Arabic word caliph, as should be explained in the note box. Ramanujaner ( talk) 20:55, 13 January 2024 (UTC)