List of municipalities in Arizona is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 7, 2008 Featured list candidate Not promoted August 11, 2009 Featured list candidate Promoted
Current status: Featured list

This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. United States: Arizona Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as High-importance).

The brackets in the title should be removed, because there aren't any in the other "by population" lists in Wikipedia.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.151.123.137 ( talk) 14:50, 8 September 2006 (UTC) They are, aren't they? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.190.166.233 ( talk) 02:02, 16 April 2012 (UTC) reply

I've completely revamped this list, patterned after List of United States cities by population. It is very important that subsequent alterations to this list strictly adhere to the population estimates issued by the Census Bureau and ignore local sources. This is the only way to ensure the list remains neutral.

I have added in a few 'skyline' pictures to help flesh out the void on the right side of the table, but we need more. I would think the top 15 should do the trick, but we are missing a lot of them. I'm going to try and hit up the Valley cities myself, but may need some help digging up pics of other cities.

That's all, hope you all find the change constructive. Sher eth 23:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Dropping in a few more photos, I think that putting in the county seats might be worthwhile as well. Not that anyone else seems to be listening :) Sher eth 22:02, 26 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi, Click to 2010 U.S. Census Bureau FactFinder2. You can edit and change list of cities in Arizona. Thank you! Ross Degenstein -- 24.111.34.170 ( talk) 23:00, 6 June 2011 (UTC) reply

From first section of article: "2010 census put 6,392,017 [!] of the state's 6,392,017 [!] residents within these cities and towns, accounting for 24.59% [!] of the population." Something seems to be wrong... 153.110.203.226 ( talk) 13:22, 6 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Would anyone be opposed to splitting the second table into List of census-designated places in Arizona as has been done with other states? The simple reason is that the title of this article is cities and towns, and should ideally list just the cities and towns. An alternative is to rename the page List of cities, towns and census-designated places in Arizona but that is rather cumbersome and unusual. Giving the CDP's their own list has already been done with most other state lists of cities. Mattximus ( talk) 01:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC) reply

I also have same kind concern, this is a list for cities and towns in Arizone, which means they must been incorporated, but CDP apparently not, is shouldn't be here, or else it should change the whole definition at lead section.-- Jarodalien ( talk) 07:48, 6 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Notes sections has this: "When communities incorporate in Arizona, they must have at least 1,500 residents to be a town and at least 3,000 to be a city. But the state makes no differences between the powers and taxing authorities of cities and towns."
However, the article also states Tusayan was incorporated in 2010 but has only under 600 residents. Something is not right about this matter. 212.50.203.198 ( talk) 05:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Good catch. "In 2003, new legislation was passed allowing any community of 500 or more to incorporate if located in proximity to a national park or monument"... I'll try to find the reference for this and add it as a note. Mattximus ( talk) 14:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of cities and towns in Arizona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080706222437/http://phoenix.gov/CITYGOV/history.html to http://phoenix.gov/CITYGOV/history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of cities and towns in Arizona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120214223014/http://www.azleague.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=about.cities to http://www.azleague.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=about.cities

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of cities and towns in Arizona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090710021123/http://www.census.gov/popest/cities/tables/SUB-EST2008-04-04.csv to https://www.census.gov/popest/cities/tables/SUB-EST2008-04-04.csv

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:05, 24 December 2017 (UTC) reply

I edited populations based on the 2020 Census and updated some of the material, but the new data.census.gov is difficult for me to navigate and I was not ultimately able to locate a table with all the population data; instead, I searched for each township by hand (ugh). If someone can find such a table, it would be best to list that as the source for the 2020 populations in the table. Zeldahime ( talk) 22:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC) reply

I've been looking for this too! Here is a list which I've been working from (scroll down) but it's not a very official site [1]. Mattximus ( talk) 21:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC) reply