This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all
list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Would be nice if these were listed in order of terms of service rather than alphabetically.
Badlandz (
talk) 17:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Well, there are only 10 names there, so it's not really that bad for HI. Other states, yes. But all the other states have these lists alphabetically. Is there a specific advantage of having it by term rather than by name? Mahalo. --
Ali'i 17:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Chronological order really makes more sense than alphabetical. The time a representative served is more important than what letter their name starts with. All states could have their lists like that.
Secretkeeper12 (
talk) 19:27, 5 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Territorial delegates?
List of United States Representatives from Territory of Hawaii redirects here, but the territorial delegates are not in the table. Is this just an oversight? Right now each of their succ boxes pints here, and it is confusing that they are not on the list. Perhaps have a second table, and then change the rediret to a section? Or make one big table? Alaska at least has a second table.
W Nowicki (
talk) 19:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)reply