This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Just a note that I'm editing the table of divisional champions so that it only includes appearances in the SEC championship game. An argument can be made that teams who finish with the same record as their divisional champion are "co-champions", but I don't think there are many people who would take it seriously--the simple fact of the Championship Game's existence has meant that only the team finishing top in each division's standings is considered divisional champion. When, say, Florida and Tennessee finish at 7-1, the phrase used in the media, by fans and by the athletic departments is, "wins the divisional title", and nobody says, "but (whoever lost the UF-Tennessee game) is still co-champion!" Also, I'm removing the note about no. of titles referring only to SEC titles, as the column header is "Number of SEC titles". Binabik80 ( talk) 06:17, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Do we really need a subsection for other teams which happen to be mentioned as conference champions of the defunct conferences? Perhaps a note listing all institutions of that conference rather than just the champs? But then again, this isn't an article on the Southern Conference or the SIAA...Thoughts? DAWGinRoswell ( talk) 13:19, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
The Gymnastics champions table is the only table on this page that is not in alphabetical order. It starts with Georgia, then Alabama, then LSU, Auburn, Arkansas, Kentucky or something similar to that. I think we should change it to alphabetical order to fit the rest of the page. AUburnTiger ( talk) 02:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey, why no mention of men's & women's track & field and cross country. SEC sponsors championships in these sports, and members have done very well on national stage. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
120.18.25.125 (
talk) 09:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)