Leicester City F.C. was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
The page needs to be updated as the Premier league win has not been recorded properly. The third paragraph begins with a sentence which assumes that the reader has been told of the win already. John2o2o2o ( talk) 08:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
We have had the season 2015-2016 now, so it seems quite OK to have their win mentioned in the article. We could also mention some of the extreme ideas linked to betting odds about their winning. Vorbee ( talk) 17:29, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't leicester 1-0 down to swindon at half time, and went to 3-0 down in the second half? Guinness 23:25, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
Feel free to add more categories to the records sections people. I only added the first few as a suggestion and to prompt more edits. Mostly, I don't have information to hand myself, but it's def. worth putting here. Guinness 18:21, August 14, 2005 (UTC)
Should Dennis Wise be included in the list of "Famous Former Players"? There is no doubt that he is a former player, but is he 'famous' enough to be included. Having played internationally for england 21 times (according to his article), I would argue strongly that the answer is "yes." Although his departure from the club and threat to sue afterwards was acrimonious and he is not loved by supporters of the club, this does not change the fact that he is a "Famous Former Player" I further propose (to prevent any future disputes), that we accept any player who has played for Leicester City and made a full appearance for his national site as a "Famous Former Player" (not necessarily to the exclusion of others). Guinness 16:13, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Jimmmmmmmmmmm
Right then, I've updated the list and added the category link. I've removed most of the names as I believe it is best to avoid quantity and specifically avoid duplicating the category list. Just keep the real cream of the crop on the list. I'm still not 100% happy that we've got clear criteria for adding people to the list, but at least it's a starting point. Guinness 19:12, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Thought I should add Zagorakis as he did spend 3-4 years at the club and is a European Championship winning captain with Greece. Makes him notable I think.
Jimmmmmmmmm 14:40 28 April 2006
"but due to the loss of Premiership television money, the cost of constructing their new stadium and Dennis Wise's suing of the club after his sacking over an incident that left Callum Davidson with a fractured cheekbone, the club went into administration with debts of £30million."
The Dennis Wise incident certainly wasn't a key factor in Leicester going into administration. I've rephrased this section as it seemed very POV. 82.17.202.62 11:43, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
A simple answer from me.... NO - After what he did to Callum Davidson after losing a game of cards!....
No way
86.17.160.81 17:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
This may have been discussed extensively before, but in reference to:
"It was because of Leicester restructuring their debts, which some misguidedly perceived to have given them an unfair advantage over their rivals, that the Football League changed their rules and now penalise teams going into administration with a ten point penalty."
I don't understand what the misguided perception was, it seems to be a POV for a start that the perception was misguided and I'd argue that it's not a misguided perception at all, but a quite correct one, since Leicester City were relegated with a premiership strength side and through going into administration had to surrender far fewer players that a team trying to avoid administration would have had to go under. That argument is surely going over old ground, but I don't understand why it is so obviously misguided that it can be stated as fact? ( Don quixote 18:19, 20 April 2006 (UTC))
Leicester City sold many players when relagated from the premiership. My mind is struggling to go back without looking at facts but Savage went for 2.5 m, Rowett for 2.5 m and Piper for 3 m. There were many other players. We were also not allowed to bring in players.
Something needs to be done with, either it be scrapped or someone find the details on it. The goals is easy but I have no idea who has made the most appearences and how many this season for example.
Jimmmmmmmmm 14:44 28 April 2006
Could somebody who knows about the team make a squad template? Guidelines can be found here SenorKristobbal 09:37, 4 August 2006 (UTC).
how do you update the following
Is 'aggreggate' a British slang term? Otherwise is has an extra fourth 'g' and should be 'aggregate'. Same for article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_English_football. I couldn't tell from just doing a Google search as it is spelled with the fourth 'g' a variety of times in relation to football. -- darklilac 15:56, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
{{
editprotected}}
Having been a slave to the OED as an editor at Oxford University Press for several years, i can confirm it's spelt 'aggregate' - no need for the fourth 'g'!
Herman Dune 09:34, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
The results list looks unstructured and messy, and also has no date information (and scorers / cards / etc... would be a nice addition too). Haven't got time to do this myself right now. Guinness 18:15, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
In addition to my comments on the FAC and as promised to User:Jimmmmmmmmm, here are some more detailed comments and suggestions:
Well I will start addressing what needs to be done but not everything is a problem. Giles lead us to 5 of our 8 cup finals, so citation not needed. We've only won 3 cups and he won one, plus lead us to two FA Cup Finals, and lead us to forth in the table. All this is in the reference website by the way.
Lee was manager when were close to getting relegated to the 3rd division so his role in saving us was important to our history. McGhee's section is small and just bridges the gap from Little to O'Niell. Taylor ruined all O'Niell work and pretty much lead us to where administration with over spending on bad players, of which I'll try and find a reference as you've asked.
Fosse Road isn't part of the Fosse Way it's just named after it so thats fine.
I'll try and do something with the list of managers but would be a shame to lose the alltime record.
Lineker/Shilton, you right needs addressing.
As for the football league administration there should be BBC story on that I'll look.
Rivalries I'll get on it, and the O'Niell quote I know he said just a matter of finding it.
Jimmmmmmmmm 13:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Not sure this request is in the right section, but could the last sentence of the opening section, describing Martin Allen's appointment, be corrected to: '...Allen had signed a three-year contract'?
Herman Dune 09:48, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Several things need to be done before GA status is approved. None of them are major and should be possible in 5 days. The minor things are jargon, major things are referencing and citation:
Once above things are done change from Hold to GA. - Shudda talk 05:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
The Milan Mandaric article claims "As the club are still a PLC, he won't have the title of Chairman for a further 23 days."
Can anybody confirm/clarify this? Is Cahill still legally the chairman? Guinness 12:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Why has there been a Milan Era section added? Most of it is in the History section anyway, but you either break up the history section or you don't. This should just be part of the history section, look at the Arsenal article for example. The main layout of this page is fine so please don't mess with it, it is not too far off FA just needs more references. Jimmmmmmmmm 16:46, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Leicester-City.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
can an admin ban this 80.43.69.197 ip as who ever it is had attacked the artical numorous times in the past 30 mins alone AfTaDaRkCrU 21:32, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
{{ helpme}} can an admin please lock this topic from edits by unregistered and newly registered users until the following IP, 81.156.137.157 finally grows up from vandalising the artical. AfTaDaRkCrU 22:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
is it worh setting up an independat artical that lists all the transferes in and out during the current and future transfer windows, we could list them per season in summer and january sections and just do the same for future seasons, whats your thoughts? AfTaDaRkCrU 13:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Yeah but i was thinking it could be something we maintain to keep a log of ALL future transfers for many seasons to come. AfTaDaRkCrU 19:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
But then you'll end up with a huge page. Each season has a tranfer section, so you can find them on there. Plus each player has it's own page, so you can check that to find out when they moved to the club. JimmyMac82 19:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
All. Please note that: Arsenal, Chelsea, Everton, Leeds, Leicester City, Liverpool, Manchester United, Newcastle United, Tottenham Hotspur and West Ham have at this time never played a game outside of the top two tiers of English football. This is 10 (ten) teams. Leeds are likely to play outside the top two tiers, this coming August, but have not done so at this time. Please do not introduce factually incorrect information into this article. Thanks. Guinness 19:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
the transfer fee for dj was 1.6 million not 1 million
would it be worth putting the players that have international caps in bold? i have seen this on other teams pages and was thinking about doing it here but thought i'd gage people's opion 1st. Skitzo, co-founder of the AfTaDaRkCrU 00:06, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
i have made a start in this article but welcome all help to improve the look and contents of it. Skitzo, co-founder of the AfTaDaRkCrU 14:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Am I right in thinking that Gordon Lee was only caretaker manager (inbetween Pleat and Little), and never officially appointed as full time manager? Guinness 17:26, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:Leicester-City.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Levein, Megson etc. There seems to be a big gap between Micky Adams's departure and the successor managers that are missing. I reckon there are five,at least, if you include caretakers. Jatrius 09:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
its a notable managers section, none since Adams have done anything note worthy. Skitzo 11:34, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Wot about Nigel Worthington? He saved Leicester from relegation like Gordon Lee, so that's something to note. Why not put his name in? 219.74.250.100 ( talk) 09:49, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
He was also only a caretaker manager thus doesn't qualify. Skitzo ( talk) 09:57, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Besides, we never got CLOSE to relegation under Kelly or Worthington, compared to when Gordon Lee took charge for that game against Oxford. It was completely out of our hands that game, no season since then have we looked so much like being relegated. Don't ruin his or Tony James' legacy by adding frivolous "notable" managers. -- MikeMetaled ( talk) 15:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
what is the concencious for removing that tag? i added it in the 1st place but i now feel it should be removed atleast until a new manager is appointed or until the transfer window reopens as someone like Kenton (and maybury to a lesser degree) are featuring regually for the 1st team. Skitzo 20:19, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Please new interwiki [el:Λέστερ Σίτυ] -- Tony esopi patra ( talk) 15:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Is there a women's team? -- 202.47.49.144 ( talk) 05:52, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Yes there is a section which tracks their progress on the official site, as yet therre isn't a Wiki article about it though. Skitzo ( talk) 06:52, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Can someone please tell me what music/song is played before a Leicester City home game? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weatherbed ( talk • contribs) 18:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
they play a number of songs, you'd have to be more specific. Skitzo ( talk) 09:00, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Not sure that the remark saying "Ian Holloway is regarded as Leicester's worst ever manager" is really factual. It is an opinion at best and anyone who witnessed Frank McLintock's tenure as City boss would be sure to disagree! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.144.230.202 ( talk) 11:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
With regards to reserve players, LEAVE the current squad alone. I understand there is players like Sappleton, Odhiambo, Cisak, Cox etc. on the fringes on the 1st team, but if they were to be part of this season's squad, why haven't they been issued a no. ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikinixon17 ( talk • contribs) 11:49, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
they are listed on the clubs official website in the 1st team squad level, that is the ONLY criteria needed. Skitzo ( talk) 16:58, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Only players that are listed on the website should be added, unless they debut/signed before the site is updated and addition is supported by a reliable source, such as the BBC website. Skitzo ( talk) 22:12, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Stephen Clemence is the club captain but5 is out injured therefore Matt Oakley is vice-captain, unless you find a source to say otherwise please leave this alone. Skitzo ( talk) 19:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Leicester have launched a new home strip and will be adding a new away 1 too, can someone with more knowledge then me update the info box please. Jimmy Skitz's Answer Machine 11:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
OK, I will begin now and likely make some straightforward copyediting changes as I go. Please feel free to revert any that inadvertently change the meaning. Let's see how those foxy foxes are.... Casliber ( talk · contribs) 06:25, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
I'll add more later. Casliber ( talk · contribs) 06:32, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
PS: Have also asked a chum to take a look. We'll help get this one over the line. Casliber ( talk · contribs) 04:47, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
It was a hard decision whether to put this on hold or fail it right now due to a high backlog on good article nominees, but because there is quite a bit of work put into this page, I think if editors show some initiative on this page, it should get a second shot sooner, rather than later. I could not find problems with grammar, spelling or any major MoS mistakes, so if someone wants to clean it up, I'll decide what to do with it. JRA_ Westy Qld2 Talk 07:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your patience! Looks good =] JRA_ Westy Qld2 Talk 08:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Lead
History
Colours
Rivalries
Club honors
Managers
Records and statistics
League history
Players
Backroom staff
References
I have this 1974 book, Observers Book of Association Football. and it says "A dozen old boys of Wyggeston School piad ninepence each to buy a football and start a soccer team in 1884. They called themselves Leicester Fosse." I was musing on putting this in, but had not seen this written elsewhere, and pondered its veracity. Further info would be welcomed. Casliber ( talk · contribs) 13:03, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
This was also on the now out of print DVD release in 2003 "The Official History of Leicester City Football Club" which has been used for other reference points on this article, i think it's safe to put it in. MIR17 17:10, 26 August2009 (UTC)
I was absolutely sure it was the 25th fiercest. Seriously, what value does that statement add, especially given that ferocity of rivalry is very subjective anyway? -- Jameboy ( talk) 11:56, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Is it still worth having this on here? Most club pages just have a full list of the managers. The list also seems to biased towards modern managers. What makes Brian Little or Micky Adams more notable than Jock Wallace or Norman Bullock? What makes Peter Taylor or Ian Holloway a more notable bad managers than Frank McLintock? Shall we just change this to a full list of managers? -- MIR17 ( talk) 10:55, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Any Foxes fans want to add more to the Neil Lennon page? His Leicster days are somewhat glossed over. Mattun0211 ( talk) 08:04, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
I think this needs sorting. It's far, far too modern weighted. 1990 onwards takes up over half the section. Either there is far too much detail on the last 20 years or there is far too little on the previous 105. -- MIR17 ( talk) 12:02, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is being held here on the possibility of rolling out a new squad template. The new template, named {{ football squad player2}}, differs from the standard squad layout in several ways:
It is proposed that the new template be added to some of Wikipedia's most high-profile club articles, which might include Leicester City F.C.. To give your thoughts, please read and contribute to the discussion at WikiProject Football.
Regards, Edinburgh Wanderer 19:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
please stop adding him to the squad list as he wasn't named in the premier league squad and given that he has another knee ligament injury he won't be getting added either, also there ias no confirmation he is no. 21, he wasn't names on that list either. Jimmy Skitz's Answer Machine 19:02, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Boeing720 ( talk) 21:02, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
The warning signs were showing,
T'was April and snowing,
The hunt was still going,
Their horns were still blowing,
'Cause the Foxes were still running free,
They raced blinding bright through the Palace of Light,
Drew the Red Devils well on a cold day in hell,
Though Spurs dig deep in and Lions chase, neither win,
So the Foxes are still running free,
We know you don’t believe us,
We know you don’t believe us,
We know you don’t believe us but…
THEY'RE GONNA RUN THE LEAGUE!!! Harley Quinn hyenaholic ( talk) 21:28, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
@ AlexMlcfc: Hi Alex. I snipped this bit you wrote, 'Due to the magnitude of Leicester's title win, it is categorized as one of the greatest achievements in English football history'. The first bit I chopped because it's possibly inaccurate: at max 83 points, the magnitude of the win itself isn't that high; it's instead impressive because of how unlikely it was. The second bit is probably not that WP:NPOV. One source saying it's 'surely the most remarkable' isn't definitive or widely held enough for Wikipedia to declare that as fact. It's better to provide info on the things we can prove, like whether it was the longest odds paid out by a bookie. I kept the Economist bit though, because that will be a nice piece of history. I'm not trying to be annoying removing your edits, and I hope this explains why! :-) Madshurtie ( talk) 13:23, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
This article (and the history) make it sound as though Leicester City was a continuation of Leicester Fosse. It was not.
The history article states
Due to financial problems, Leicester Fosse had ceased to exist when the League resumed in 1919.
As it says, Leicester Fosse had ceased to exist so it could not be reformed. The history of Leicester Fosse is distinct from that of Leicester City, the two should not be confused. 86.151.36.84 ( talk) 11:54, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
@ Qed237: @ AlexMlcfc: Hi Qed, just wondering where the consensus was outlined that runners up finishes aren't to be included on the honours page. I have seen them on other pages (e.g. West Ham, Bayern Munich) so was just wondering whether it's left to the consensus of the club community, whether those clubs need correcting, or whether there isn't really that clear of a consensus. Thanks. Madshurtie ( talk) 08:07, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi guys. Just to input on the conversation, I personally really do want to add the runners up, in the Honours section, as they are still key dates in the club's history, and I just feel for them not to be mentioned it's almost not showing a full history of the club in major competitions (i.e 4 FA Cup finals, Premier League runner up in 1929-30 etc). There is more to show in the honours section I feel. I've been told not to add the runners up in the honours, but would like to. Of course, Qed237 makes some good points about it so hope you don't think I'm criticizing Qed237. Just genuinely think it would improve this section of the page though. I know entirely what to add if I get the green light to do this. Oh! Just noticed it's added in, are we all agreed now then on this?
As a side note, why is Leicester's european record highlighted in Red? I think it would be improved by having a key at the bottom rather than a colour code. With a key it is just simpler to understand in my opinion (i.e 7-2 but to who? Can we put opposition as the right and Leicester as left?). However, again not a criticism, just a suggestion.
Excellent, thanks for listening to my suggestion about the European record and including runners up, means a lot. As long as other users are ok with this of course, I hope I haven't ruined anyone's edits, I didn't intend to, I was just suggesting what I think is best from my perspective. The runners up being included, and the european record not being in red, looks great at the moment. I hope both aspects are kept as they are currently, as I personally think it's good how it is at the moment, but that's just my own opinion. Thank you very much. All the best. AlexMlcfc ( talk) 15:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Leicester City F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Brackets need to be inserted on IPA 88.104.44.229 ( talk) 22:09, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Leicester City Football Club /ˌlɛstər ˈsɪti/ → Leicester City Football Club (/ˌlɛstər ˈsɪti/) 88.104.44.229 ( talk) 01:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Where vas Leicester during Uefa 2016 Cup? Nowhere, as th coach decided so. Only Vardy some short time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.218.42.132 ( talk) 13:35, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Leicester City F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
@ Mattythewhite and Fares57: Greetings Fares57 and thanks for your clear comment on my talk page. Coming from a numerical sciences background, I will admit I only ever bet when the odds are stacked in my favour -a rare event. Whilst kit is clearly essential and half time refreshments served at the ground desirable, a bet is of marginal importance for adults and illegal for under 16's. Also unlike food it could be placed with any on-line bookmaker. The source itself sounds like an overhyped poor translation & is certainly not a wp:RS. To me the whole thing seems to falls foul of wp:advert but I could live with it. I'm hoping Mattythewhite can provide an unbiased view -for which thanks in advance. Regards JRPG ( talk) 21:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello @ JRPG:, thanx for your reply. I am very new to the Wiki community, so I can't reply to all this. If it is a "foul", it can be deleted. Just started learning! Fares57 ( talk) 07:42, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
...should not be inserted until January as both sources currently do not show that and I have not found any websites on that anyway, Iggy ( talk) 12:05, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 13 external links on Leicester City F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:16, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Leicester City F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/Rousing-tune-leads-way-City-victory/story-28948744-detail/story.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:48, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
The list of players achieving international honours at the club is getting very long and likely to only get longer still. Should this be split off into its own article? Skeene88 ( talk) 15:22, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Leicester fans do not consider Coventry City to be their biggest rivals. I expect a Coventry City fan is vandalising this page. The only reputable surveys done have Nottingham Forest as the club's biggest rivals with Derby and Coventry behind. [1] [2] [3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:D292:1501:11BD:B109:C962:12AC ( talk) 15:00, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Even the sources in the current section state that Coventry are tertiary rivals.
References
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the infobox the away kit has shorts shown that are the same colour as the shirt. The actual shorts are dark blue. Proposed edit:
Replace this line:
| shorts2 = D6F3F1
With this line:
| shorts2 = 2B3A5B
Based on this picture: https://shop.lcfc.com/leicester-city-away-shorts-2021-22
Arkadye ( talk) 11:13, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
What are people's opinions on removing the International honours section. It is completely unsourced and I don't believe it is especially notable as Leicester are an established Premier League club therefore are likely to have several international players at any one time. Would it be acceptable to remove it to avoid the article becoming overly crowded? Michaeldble ( talk) 13:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
The result was: rejected by
Cowlibob (
talk) 22:40, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Created by SpyridisioAnnis ( talk). Self-nominated at 14:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC).
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA from 2009. There's quite a lot of uncited material in the article that needs to be cited. Onegreatjoke ( talk) 21:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)