This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Wisconsin Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Protected areas Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the first time I've done this, I think. The entire article, with the exception of the first paragraph, is copy pasted verbatim from http://nerrs.noaa.gov/NERRSReserve.aspx?ID=616&ResID=LKS. I have attributed with the correct template at the bottom, although the link to the actual source page does not appear, but is present in the template in edit mode. I am rather uncomfortable copy pasting, but figure that the source is well written and as it is public domain, an economical way to make this article. I have done all of this in good faith, so if this is not allowed, please delete this article and yell at me. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:43, 10 August 2014 (UTC) reply

I think the article looks good, and the attribution was properly done (other than a 'technical' issue that was preventing proper display, which I fixed). Carefully done, this is actually a quite good way to, like you said, 'economically' create articles on missing topics. Revent ^talk 01:05, 10 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Thank you so much Revent for the fix. I don't know how you know all this. I'm just baffled with all the }}} and {{{ and such. As for the legality of the whole thing, great to hear it is all okay. I still feel guilty, but am glad Wikipedia has the article. And this is the entry point to one of NOAA's goldmines. I'm still shopping for more. :) All the best. :) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 13:14, 10 August 2014 (UTC) reply