Ladislaus III of Hungary has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 22, 2015. ( Reviewed version).

A fact from Ladislaus III of Hungary appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 February 2015 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that Ladislaus III of Hungary reigned less than a year and died before his sixth birthday? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ladislaus III of Hungary.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ladislaus III of Hungary/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 3family6 ( talk · contribs) 04:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC) reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is " clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   No copyvios, prose is clear without error.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   "Likely" is colloquial (and I have used it myself in college essays, which is how I found this out), so try different wording such as "probably" or "possibly."

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   Well formatted reference lists provided.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

   B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:

   Adequate citations to reliable sources.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

   C. No original research:

   All content is verifiable.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   The article is very short. I've passed short articles before ( Yo'nal Ahk III), but this one is even shorter than those, and I'm not sure if this is acceptable or not under the good article criteria. I'm requesting a second opinion on this.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

   I brought this up on the GA criteria talk page, and this article is fine.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:15, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

   B. Focused:

   Focused on the subject.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Neutral, balanced presentation.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Highly stable, no instances of major disruption in this article's history.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   Image is in public domain.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   The image is useful, quite artistic, and has a suitable caption.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

7. Overall: I'm not sure about the size of this article, so I'm requesting a second opinion.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

   It's fine, so I'm going to go ahead an pass this.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:15, 22 January 2015 (UTC) reply

   Pass or Fail:

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 7, 2019.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility. Croatia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Hungary High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Middle Ages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.