This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Metropolis Ltd was copied or moved into Kult (role-playing game) with this edit on 28 March 2023. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Should this page be moved to Kult (game) or Kult (rpg) since there is now a Kult (band) article as well?
Perhaps? Why not? As long as it isnt a *big* problem, we dont need to do nothing about it :) Noone 10:59, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I would rather say that the game Kult draws on similarities and magical orders based on millennia-old beliefs systems, not the opposite, honestly.
Rumours say the game and/or its designers were condemned by the papacy. Does anyone have sourced information on this? Johan L 23:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
The list of editions in different languages is not complete. I own one set of first edition books in german, including the rulebook and OK-KULT (supplement only available in german). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Recombine ( talk • contribs) 19:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC).
This appears to be mostly word-for-word from http://www.kult-rpg.com/wiki/kult - it would appear someone has lifted one from the other. - 203.87.69.229 07:13, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
This article needs some cleaning. I have corrected smaller mistakes here and there, but in general the article has sections with very akward syntax. I surmise that some of the contributors may not have English as their primary language. Any help would be much appreciated.
80.196.177.84 ( talk) 10:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kult (role-playing game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://pub.tv2.no/dyn-nettavisen/arkiv/?archiveSection=765&archiveItem=140520When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:44, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Things to fix:
General update because of the new edition.
It is not possible to say 1st edition was less action-oriented than subsequent ones, after all, it did feature an extensive guns section. The new edition (Divinity Lost) should be presented as focusing more on mystery and psychological horror than action, because that's how its Apocalypse Now engine works (=its not a simulationist or detail-oriented rpg engine).
Better organization: clearly say what edition each paragraph talks about. Some sections speak as if there aren't different editions with wildly different rulesets.
Pruning OR: ttrpg articles are notoriously difficult to source, but the current article contains too much OR.
More?
CapnZapp ( talk) 08:53, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
I noticed the recent attempt to provide a 4th edition cover picture. While probably made in good-faith, the attempt will likely be deleted because the uploader did not successfully navigate the honestly very tricky waters of picture licenses and permissions.
In this case, the picture we want is clearly NOT free, and so the correct approach is to clearly state this in the uploading. Instead of being asked to prove you have permission, you should argue your upload meets the definition of "fair use" per WP:NFCI. Most movie posters would fall into this category, for instance. Do upload a very small low-res version (or a bot will come around and mangle your picture for you) per WP:IMAGERES.
Also, since WP:NOTCENSORED, the original cover picture is here if you want to give it another go. Cheers CapnZapp ( talk) 00:57, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:06, 6 September 2019 (UTC)