From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Revamp

The article has received a much-needed makeover, with language corrected and sources/review added. The excessive detail on the ride itself had to be removed as this was WP:NOR, and could also be argued to be WP:TRIVIA. Wikipedia is also not WP:NOTMANUAL. Three images was also excessive for an article this size. That said, I will attempt find more valid information that can be added to help pad it out. PurpleHeartEditor (talk) 06:57, 19 September 2011 (UTC) reply

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kraken (roller coaster)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague ( talk · contribs) 00:09, 7 July 2013 (UTC) Review will come in a few days. QatarStarsLeague ( talk) 00:09, 7 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Infobox & lead

Fine here.

History

Excellent here.

Characteristics

Pass.

Ride experience

Pass.

Reception

This section passes.

Conclusion

Another excellent nomination from OB&M! Congratulations! QatarStarsLeague ( talk) 21:09, 7 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Attraction name

Since it appears that Kraken is the latest attraction to get into the virtual-reality craze, park officials decided to plus up the name for this promotion. However, we have no proof to indicate that this change is permanent. In the battle of sources, independent beats WP:PRIMARY, and RCDB retains the Kraken name. If we get information that SeaWorld has no plans of removing VR from the ride, then we can discuss the name change. -- McDoob AU93 18:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC) reply