This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I want some information posted on the 2003 bushfires in Kosciuszko national park. If you have any information on this topic from a reliable source and that is not copyrighted please type it in (go to edit this page at the top of the page) to help people with their research. Thanks heaps, you rock.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 144.139.223.199 ( talk • contribs) 18:10, 14 March 2006 (UTC+11 hours)
Is this structure within the national park? Should the articles be merged, or would anyone be able to add any references to Geehi Hut?
Multiple independent references would clearly establish notability. Ga rr ie 02:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Propose merge from Geehi Hut to this article. Due to lack of appropriate content for the article and following the case where most other hut articles are not kept. :: maelgwn :: talk 07:53, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Support The Australian Alps article has a section on huts. Once there were enough huts listed perhaps they could have a page of their own (there are hundreds after all) - or form part of an article on the early european settlement of the area? Alexander110 04:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Oppose I would prefer to keep pages for individual notable huts, like the Geehi Hut, YHA Hut and Daveys Hut, have a list of alpine huts in Australia, if others are inclined and have small sections on this and the Alps article which summarise their significance. - Shiftchange ( talk) 13:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Alpine huts in Australia have significant cultural, social, historical, and heritage significance. There should be a sperate article on the huts with the more significant huts having their own articles. Ronnam ( talk) 05:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
I discovered this on dead end articles. It does not seem very notable. The source is odd, being the first time I have seen a reference to a notice at the place. It looks like everything that needs to be said, can be said here at Kosciuszko National Park but I welcome other views. -- Bduke (Discussion) 07:26, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
The comment below was added to the article by User:203.57.44.177. It was move here by TB ( talk) 19:07, 1 April 2010 (UTC).
sorry but someone haz edited thi page theres no chinese elm
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Kosciuszko National Park's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "ABS":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:20, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kosciuszko National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kosciuszko National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:00, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kosciuszko National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:59, 12 December 2017 (UTC)