This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Klamath River article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days

	Klamath River has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 29, 2011 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Oregon Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical). Rivers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was a Collaboration of the Week/Month for WikiProject Oregon June 21–June 30, 2008.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Klamath River was copied or moved into Un-Dam the Klamath with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2021 and 25 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gcohen02, Dakotamargolis.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 01:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Ref 52 is broken. On another note, great job Shannon1! Little Mountain 5 00:40, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply

...and never mind. AnomieBOT fixed it. Little Mountain 5 00:44, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks, I'm working to get this article up to a GA level, like Rogue River, although Finetooth did a far better job on that. Shannon ^talk _contribs 02:11, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply

A reference to a collective volume with two editors preferably needs author and chapter title for the text cited, not just general title and page no. as in earlier version of citation 25.--Felix folio secundus 20:55, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi, While browsing on a different subject, I came across this interesting article in The Washington Post [1], going into detail about how Dick Cheney exerted power to reverse the environmental flow decision. I've put it into the text, but being new to all this editing stuff, it shows up as a link not a reference as I don't yet know how to put a reference in! If someone could teach me how to do this it would be a nice thing to do! Thanks, Mondegreen de plume ( talk) 01:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your interest in the river and for your input. If you look at the article in edit mode, you'll see how the "cite" templates work. You can simply imitate the form of the two citations directly below that of the one you are trying to add. A more complete explanation of the templates is at WP:CIT. In this article, be sure to stick with the "cite" family rather than using the "citation" family or other formats since the "cite" family is used for all of the other refs in this article. Hope this helps. Finetooth ( talk) 01:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi, some content was moved to Un-Dam the Klamath from the Salmon controversy and proposed dam removal section. Xicanx ( talk) 16:20, 24 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi we are working on a class project and are incorporating a lot more about the klamath basin tribes and their historical relationship with US government and agencies and modern day population and stewardship. We are going to integrate it into history and add a new section. All of our sources should be peer reviewed/reliable and our text will be cited. gcohen02 ( talk) 12:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC) reply