KMEX-DT has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 8, 2022. ( Reviewed version).

A fact from KMEX-DT appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 March 2022 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that after Los Angeles Spanish-language TV station KMEX-TV discovered that 15 percent of its viewers did not know the language, it added Spanish courses to its programming? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/KMEX-DT.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Television: Stations Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as High-importance).

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2019 and 6 October 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mflore10.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 01:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC) reply

For most of its existence, the station served as an Univision affiliate but became the Univision affiliate for Los Angeles on July 1, 2006, following the defection of long-time Telemundo station KVEA to Univision.

I moved this content here for further discussion/evaluation because it is confusing. The date stated is in the future. Additionally, a check of KMEX-TV's website still shows an Univision affiliation. It's unclear what this content is trying to convey. Tobycat , 03:38 12 January 2006 (UTC)

• That makes no sense, as KMEX-TV is owned by Univision and KVEA is owned by NBC Universal. I asked around to a couple people I know who work at both stations and it is not true in any way. -- FunkyChicken! 03:39, January 12, 2006 (UTC)

Univision never thought of changing affiliations, they have a partnership to ease the competition with a Telemundo affiliate. They share an agreement with Televisa of Mexico, which is up against Azteca America, KAZA channel 54 and LATV, KJLA channel 57. The L.A. area is said to have the largest Hispanic population in the continental United States, in addition to transmissions into the Palm Springs, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Bakersfield and Yuma, Az. TV markets. KMEX-TV decidedly to remain Univision instead of going independent, because KMEX is owned completely by Univision and doesn't desire to be Telemundo.+ 71.102.3.86 ( talk) 16:59, 11 July 2009 (UTC) reply

KMEX had a translator K39DW (shut down in 2016) for the Victorville, California area, but I believe it's now on Channel 33 (formerly a TBN turned independent station KVVB moved its programs to K55CW 34). KMEX had translators on channels 26 and 48 in the San Diego area in the 1980s-90s- also were TBN affiliates, and even channel 63 (KEXV) now 40 in Palm Springs, California area. It's interesting both the US' first major city Spanish-language and Christian program TV stations had relationships with each other in Southern California in the 1960s-70s. 67.49.85.100 ( talk) 00:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC) reply

To all editors, please see the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Newscast_schedules.2C_redux, where the issue of removing locally originated programming schedules is discussed. Calwatch 05:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Image:Kmex2006.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Kmex la.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Univision-a-su-ladoLogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC) reply

I want to address this issue on KMEX-TV's reputation being the #1 rated television station in the Los Angeles area in any language. KMEX-TV's common cable channel in most of the L.A. area is channel 3. In the 1980s and 1990s, when television sets used VCRs at the time - one who wants to play a VHS tape have to use channel 3 to have the video play. KMEX may have a high rating more because of VCRs! However, KMEX-TV set the stage for a thriving Hispanic/Latino and other ethnic media in the US we have today. KMEX-TV has a subchannel Bounce TV for African-American viewers and rumor has it KMEX negotiates a deal with returning Urban America Television network, a 2000s television network aimed at ethnic (Latino and African-American, as well Asian and Middle Eastern) viewers. Back then, UAT had over-air stations in Fresno and San Luis Obispo, California, and was on cable in the LA and SF Bay areas. Not surprisingly, KMEX is on over-air channel 3 via K39DW-D the translator for the Mojave Desert region. Univision (formerly SIN - Spanish Independent Network) used to have an Inland Empire, California affiliate KBLM-LP channel 25 in the 1980s-early 90s, but these two regions are part of the Los Angeles area TV market. 2605:E000:FDCA:4200:83B:D708:FFFA:74BC ( talk) 21:58, 22 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KMEX-DT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC) reply

GA toolbox
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions

This review is transcluded from Talk:KMEX-DT/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski ( talk · contribs) 22:28, 28 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)}

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Links

Prose

Lede

• Lede sentence is a bit clumsy - KMEX-DT, virtual and UHF digital channel 34,. Couldn't we talk about the channels a bit later in the lede?Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 23:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC) reply
• Spanish-language Univision television network - WP:SEAOFBLUE.Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 23:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC) reply
• also West Coast flagship station. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 17:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

• You might gather I did not write much of the lead... It's been my experience that sometimes leads get, ahem, changed. The channels do belong on line 1, see below. Sammi Brie (she/her •  t • c) 20:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

• pioneering Spanish-language station, paving the way for other such stations and networks in the United States; - bit POV. ^{according to whom?}Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 23:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC) reply

• Removed. Sammi Brie (she/her •  t • c) 20:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

• I'd like to have at least a sentence covering what the station actually covers (news and sports)Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 23:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC) reply

•  Done (sports might be undue to put in the lead but not news)

General

• The bid of Spanish International Television presaged that of Spanish International Broadcasting Company six years later; - is presaged the right word here?Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 17:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

• Yes. Many of the same principals were involved. It's a notable precursor to the group that built the station. Sammi Brie (she/her •  t • c) 20:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

• That October, however, the radio station dropped its bid.- why?Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 17:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

• No reason was given in any source I could find. Most likely they realized "this is not going to make us much money". Sammi Brie (she/her •  t • c) 20:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

• The body uses "Channel 34" a lot, - "build a channel 34 station", does the number matter?Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 17:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

• Very much so. You will also see at times in US media the use of channel number as metonymy for the station: "Oh, there's a new show on Channel 7..." Even some of the Spanish-language sources do this if you look at some of the titles that have "Canal 34" in them. US television is not the UK ( WP:TVS did not have BBC One in its scope until recently) at all.

• I use "channel XX" to reduce the number of times I have to recite the call letters in the article to refer to the station.
• For some stations, their channel number is very relevant because historically, television stations on channels 14 and above had a unique set of challenges. See UHF television broadcasting. I have some 30 DYKs (and now a GA, WNAO-TV) on stations in the 1950s that went kaput because of such challenges.

• I'd link Bullfighting Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 17:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

•  Done

• which prompted some controversy - unless you are going to say what it was, don't mention this. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 17:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

•  Done

• From the start - not needed. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 17:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

•  Done

• Link NFL Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 17:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

•  Done

• U.S.–Mexico - MOS:US. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 17:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

•  Done

• audacious ^{according to whom?} Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 17:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

•  Done

• Sports broadcasting starts from 2016, but the history says " sports announcer for the station in 1964". Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 17:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

• That's because the section focuses on local sports. The station would have had sports presenters for the news (including, you guessed it, Villanueva) and national sports broadcasts from the network, so this is not the disconnect it may seem.

• The station's digital signal is multiplexed: - this doesn't really explain anything about the table.Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 17:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

• It doesn't, but it also is bog-standard. You will find that exact sentence in thousands of these pages.

• Ridgecrest: K17HY-D - why do we have an external link in the body?Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 17:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

• That link goes to an FCC page with technical information on the translator. Some stations have a lot of these (luckily this is not Utah where some stations have 100+ associated translators). This has come up at other discussions for GA: cf Talk:KTVK/GA1 and this discussion. Sammi Brie (she/her •  t • c) 20:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Review meta comments

• I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 22:28, 28 February 2022 (UTC) reply

• @ Lee Vilenski: I've made many of the suggested changes. Some of these are topic-level issues (let's just say with each GA I do, I end up with some non-notable anchor at prod or AfD and some sort of formatting change suggestion to the field). The external link issue requires a bit more care, and I've linked some prior precedent on that topic. Sammi Brie (she/her •  t • c) 20:07, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

I've made a couple changes to the read to make it easier for someone not familiar with the subject. Passing. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 13:40, 8 March 2022 (UTC) reply