This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics: American Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as High-importance). United States: Massachusetts / Presidents Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents (assessed as High-importance). Human rights Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject United States History To-do: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs Other : Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess: {{ WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}} {{ WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

The editor who created this page wrote this passage in the article:

"Adams rose again to argue that the right to petition was a universal right granted by God so that those in the weakest positions might always have recourse to those in the most powerful. None agreed with him or joined him.[24]" (Italics added by myself)

24. ^ Miller, ‘’Arguing about Slavery, 270

Let's take a quick look at the source, p. 270, in Miller:

Miller writes that Adams advocated "the universal natural right to petition as a plea from every kind of weakenness to every kind of power, available to American slaves as to the the humblest and least powerful and most aggrieved anywhere."

Neither in Miller's words, nor in the quotations he provides by Adams on the floor of the House of Representatives, is the word "God" used.

Why is the word "God" inserted in the passage when neither Miller or Adams used it in the source provided? This amounts to original research and is not permitted at Wikipedia.

Secondly, on p. 270 Miller says that " William Slade" of Vermont "would have [defended Adams] "and Slade tried to get the floor, but the Speaker of the House did not call upon him."

Thus, Miller provides evidence that Adams had some support, and belies the claim that "None agreed with him", but it fits with the effort by the editor to build a water-tight argument that Adams stood entirely alone. This kind of tendentious writing will not do. The offending sentence has been removed. 36hourblock ( talk) 19:57, 5 June 2012 (UTC) reply