Jerome, Arizona is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 11, 2020.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 9, 2013 Good article nominee Listed June 7, 2017 Featured article candidate Promoted
Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Arizona Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Mid-importance). Ghost towns Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ghost towns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ghost towns on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ghost townsWikipedia:WikiProject Ghost townsTemplate:WikiProject Ghost townsGhost town articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wondering how to edit this U.S. City Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Cities standards might help.

Jerome became a notorious " wild west" town, a hotbed of prostitution, gambling, and vice. On 5 February, 1903, the New York Sun proclaimed Jerome to be "the wickedest town in the State"

(Imagine that since arizona wasn't a state until 1912 someone screwed up) -- User:68.3.0.195 23:07, 27 October 2005

Editor User:Nyttend deleted a number of links as spam, but removed some that are genuinely useful:

• Jerome Arizona, the Town with the Billion Dollar View --description, history and references, at a (largely)

non-commercial site

• Jerome State Historic Park

--a history article, at the regional museum (Sharlot Hall).

• The Jerome Times --the town newspaper

None of these strike me as spam. I propose restoring them. Pete Tillman 01:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Misunderstanding, I shouldn't have removed them, so I've restored them. My apologies. Nyttend 01:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC) reply

No problem; thanks for putting them back. I'll probably retitle the Sharlot Hall article, since it's actuallly about (ims) the old Douglas mansion, that became a State Park.

Sharlot Hall, incidentally, was Arizona's first State Historian, just after statehood. She was a person, not a building. Cheers, Pete Tillman 04:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC) reply

This latest edit, by 66.82.9.104, needs a rewrite to remove the promotional tone -- it reads like a Chmaber of Commerce puff-piece now. Cheers -- Pete Tillman ( talk) 02:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Done, with general cleanup and some new info added. Cheers, Pete Tillman ( talk) 06:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC), who had lunch in Jerome yesterday reply

I'm confused by the many variety of uses of the term "United Verde", and am wondering if someone can please clarify this either here or in the various articles that mention these. Varieties I've seen include:

• United Verde
• United Verde Mine

United Verde refers to the bigger of the two mines at Jerome; it also is shorthand for the company that owned the mine and for infrastructure associated with that particular mine; for example, the United Verde and Pacific Railway. Finetooth ( talk) 19:29, 25 December 2012 (UTC) reply

• United Verde mine (redirect to Jerome, Arizona#Mining; note missing section)
• United Verde Extension (redirect to Jerome, Arizona#United Verde Extension; note missing section)

Yes, horribly confusing. Good catch. I forgot to fix the redirects after greatly expanding the Jerome article. I've now redirected them more sensibly, I hope. Finetooth ( talk) 19:29, 25 December 2012 (UTC) reply

United Verde mine now redirects to Jerome, Arizona#History and United Verde Extension to Jerome, Arizona#Early 20th century. Finetooth ( talk) 19:37, 25 December 2012 (UTC) reply

• UVX (probably simply acronym of United Verde Extension)

Correct. UVX can be used as a shorthand for the mine or the company that owned the mine, or as an adjective describing infrastructure associated with that particular mine; for example the UVX smelter at Clemenceau. Finetooth ( talk) 19:29, 25 December 2012 (UTC) reply

• UVX Mining Co.

This short list seems to have been created by someone in hopes that the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) sites related to the UVX would eventually have articles of their own. I added a couple of words to the lead sentence in hopes of making it a bit more clear. Finetooth ( talk) 19:29, 25 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks, djr13 ( talk) 18:13, 25 December 2012 (UTC) reply

The further confusion, which I hope the Geology section makes clear, is that the two mines were not two parts of the same mine or the same ore body even though their names seem to imply that they were. They were two fabulously rich but separate deposits. Thank you for pointing out these confusions. I hope I have cleared them up, but if you see anything else amiss or have further suggestions, we can certainly make further adjustments. Finetooth ( talk) 19:29, 25 December 2012 (UTC) reply

This looks pretty good, I think it solves the confusion I had. Thanks! djr13 ( talk) 01:25, 6 February 2013 (UTC) reply

I am nominating this article for Good status on behalf of User:Finetooth, who did a fine expansion job. FT does not wish to guide the article through formal review processes. I had no part in conducting research for, or expanding, this article but I am happy to address concerns that may arise during the review process. Thanks. -- Another Believer _{( Talk)} 05:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC) reply

This line makes no sense: "Males had a median income of $23,750 versus $23,750 for females." If they're exactly the same it's not "versus" anything, and I can't find this on the linked census info page. Can anyone clarify? JamesG5 ( talk) 19:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks for catching this. The stats were added by robots after the 2000 census and again after the 2010 census, then later modified by humans who probably thought that the two sets of similar robot stats included too much detail. The male/female claim that you noticed makes no sense to me either; it may be a typo. I simplified and modified the claims, citing the Census Bureau's American FactFinder tables for Jerome in 2014. To get at these stats about Jerome, key "Jerome town, Arizona" into the FactFinder search engine. That will take you to a page with a lot of other clickable options related to Jerome. The "Income" choice in the menu on the left side has the median income stat, and the "Selected Economic Characteristics" has the poverty stat. There are many more stats for Jerome; I'm not sure which, if any, are important enough to include in a general encyclopedia article. Finetooth ( talk) 22:00, 10 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Appreciate the fix! JamesG5 ( talk) 04:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jerome, Arizona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130412144103/http://www.geotimes.org/jan07/Travels0107.html to http://www.geotimes.org/jan07/Travels0107.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:26, 6 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Need to update — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.80.132 ( talk) 01:56, 8 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Good catch. Updated. A further update will be needed after the November elections. Finetooth ( talk) 17:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Slight mistake. You put John Kyl but he died in 73. It's actually Jon Kyl — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.80.132 ( talk) 21:10, 11 September 2018 (UTC) reply

I updated it for you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.80.132 ( talk) 21:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Highway 89: I have no objection to adding the Köppen climate classification to the article, but the claim that the correct classification is Csa needs an inline citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia is not a reliable source for itself, and the Köppen climate classification page, though interesting and informative, can't be the RS for the Csa claim. Furthermore, I don't think Csa is the correct classification. When I look at the graphic at the top of the Köppen climate classification page, it appears to me that Jerome, which lies east of the Sierra Nevada is in a B region rather than a C region. Weatherbase says the correct classification is BSk (Tropical and Subtropical Steppe Climate). If you agree, let me know, and I'll add this correction as well as an inline citation to Weatherbase. If you have a better source, please let me know. Finetooth ( talk) 03:18, 9 July 2019 (UTC) reply

does anyone else feel this article needs at least some updating? Town's water report should be updated, sliding jail needs an update, economy and culture needs an update, median income could be updated if it's available. Therapyisgood ( talk) 16:06, 11 October 2020 (UTC) reply