Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Eddie891 ( talk · contribs) 22:03, 17 May 2018 (UTC) reply

I've copyedited a bit. I don't really think there's anything that I can say against approving, but given the length, I'm going to request a second opinion. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:16, 19 May 2018 (UTC) reply

I think the only criteria that I would question is broad but I see no indication that there's significant information missing. I think we've seen a recent trend that shorter articles can obtain GA status and so I see no barriers to passing this. Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 15:27, 25 May 2018 (UTC) reply